Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/North_Carolina_v._Pearce> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 39 of
39
with 100 items per page.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce abstract "North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), is a United States Supreme Court case that forbids judicial “vindictiveness” from playing a role in the increased sentence a defendant receives after a new trial. In sum, due process requires that a defendant be “free of apprehension” of judicial vindictiveness. Time served for a new conviction of the same offense must be “fully credited,” and a trial judge seeking to impose a greater sentence on retrial must affirmatively state the reasons for imposing such a sentence.".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce wikiPageID "35070735".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce wikiPageRevisionID "549759621".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce arguedate "--02-24".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce argueyear "1969".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce citation "172800.0".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce concurrence "Doulas, joined by Marshall".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce concurrence "White".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce dissent "Black".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce dissent "Harlan".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce decidedate "--06-23".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce decideyear "1969".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce fullname "State of North Carolina et al. v. Clifton A. Pearce v. William S. Rice".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce hasPhotoCollection North_Carolina_v._Pearce.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce holding "Trial court denied respondents' due process right by imposing a heavier sentence to punish respondent for having his original conviction set aside.".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce lawsapplied Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce litigants "North Carolina v. Pearce".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce majority "Stewart, joined by Brennan and Warren".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce prior "17280.0".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce scotus "1969".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce subsequent "172800.0".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce uspage "711".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce usvol "395".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce subject Category:1969_in_United_States_case_law.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce type Case.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce type LegalCase.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce type UnitOfWork.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce type Situation.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce comment "North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (1969), is a United States Supreme Court case that forbids judicial “vindictiveness” from playing a role in the increased sentence a defendant receives after a new trial. In sum, due process requires that a defendant be “free of apprehension” of judicial vindictiveness.".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce label "North Carolina v. Pearce".
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce sameAs m.0j7kw89.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce sameAs Q7054695.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce sameAs Q7054695.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce wasDerivedFrom North_Carolina_v._Pearce?oldid=549759621.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce isPrimaryTopicOf North_Carolina_v._Pearce.
- North_Carolina_v._Pearce name "State of North Carolina et al. v. Clifton A. Pearce v. William S. Rice".