Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Nuclear_Posture_Review> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review abstract "The Nuclear Posture Review is a process “to determine what the role of nuclear weapons in U.S. security strategy should be.”The first NPR of 2002 was the second of these quadrennial reviews of United States nuclear forces undertaken by the United States Department of Defense. The first took place in 1994. The final report is National Security Classified and submitted to the Congress of the United States.The 2002 Nuclear Posture Review also included components requiring the "Pentagon to draft contingency plans for the use of nuclear weapons against at least seven countries, naming not only Russia and the "axis of evil"--Iraq, Iran, and North Korea--but also China, Libya and Syria."President Barack Obama's 2010 Nuclear Posture Review was preceded by high expectations because of his 2009 speech in Prague, Czech Republic where he prominently outlined a vision of a world without nuclear weapons. His NPR was hoped by observers to make concrete moves toward this goal. The finished 2010 policy renounces development of any new nuclear weapons such as the bunker-busters proposed by the Bush administration, and for the first time rules out a nuclear attack against non-nuclear-weapon states who are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This rule pointedly excludes Iran and North Korea.As part of the implementation of the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review, the U.S. Government is reviewing its nuclear deterrence requirements and nuclear plans to ensure that they are aligned to address today's threats. Rose Gottemoeller, U.S. Acting Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, said in early June 2012 that the United States was considering what forces the United States needed to maintain for strategic stability and deterrence, including extended deterrence and assurance to U.S. Allies and partners. Based on this analysis the United States would develop proposals for potential further reductions in its nuclear stockpile.".
- Nuclear_Posture_Review wikiPageExternalLink 2010%20Nuclear%20Posture%20Review%20Report.pdf.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review wikiPageExternalLink transcript.aspx?transcriptid=1108.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review wikiPageExternalLink npr.htm.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review wikiPageID "1834815".
- Nuclear_Posture_Review wikiPageRevisionID "508864424".
- Nuclear_Posture_Review hasPhotoCollection Nuclear_Posture_Review.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review subject Category:Nuclear_weapons_of_the_United_States.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type Artifact100021939.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type Device103183080.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type Instrument103574816.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type Instrumentality103575240.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type NuclearWeapon103834604.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type NuclearWeaponsOfTheUnitedStates.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type Object100002684.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type PhysicalEntity100001930.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type Weapon104565375.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type WeaponOfMassDestruction104565963.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review type Whole100003553.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review comment "The Nuclear Posture Review is a process “to determine what the role of nuclear weapons in U.S. security strategy should be.”The first NPR of 2002 was the second of these quadrennial reviews of United States nuclear forces undertaken by the United States Department of Defense. The first took place in 1994.".
- Nuclear_Posture_Review label "Nuclear Posture Review".
- Nuclear_Posture_Review sameAs 핵_태세_검토_보고서.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review sameAs m.05_pt3.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review sameAs Q6502874.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review sameAs Q6502874.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review sameAs Nuclear_Posture_Review.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review wasDerivedFrom Nuclear_Posture_Review?oldid=508864424.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review homepage 2010%20Nuclear%20Posture%20Review%20Report.pdf.
- Nuclear_Posture_Review isPrimaryTopicOf Nuclear_Posture_Review.