Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ontario_v._Quon> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- Ontario_v._Quon abstract "Ontario v. Quon, sometimes cited as City of Ontario v. Quon, 130 S.Ct. 2619, 560 U.S. ___ (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the extent to which the right to privacy applies to electronic communications in a government workplace. It was an appeal by the city of Ontario, California, from a Ninth Circuit decision holding that it had violated the Fourth Amendment rights of two of its police officers when it disciplined them following an audit of pager text messages that discovered many of those messages were personal in nature, some sexually explicit. The Court unanimously held that the audit was work-related and thus did not violate the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable search and seizure.Ontario police sergeant Jeff Quon, along with other officers and those they were exchanging messages with, had sued the city, their superiors and the pager service provider in federal court. They had alleged a violation of not only their constitutional rights but federal telecommunications privacy laws. Their defense was that a superior officer had promised the pager messages themselves would not be audited if the officers reimbursed the city for fees it incurred when they exceeded a monthly character limit.Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion signed by seven of his fellow justices. It decided the case purely on the reasonableness of the pager audit, explicitly refusing to consider "far-reaching issues" it raised on the grounds that modern communications technology and its role in society was still evolving. He nevertheless discussed those issues at some length in explaining why the Court chose not to rule on them, in addition to responding, for argument's sake, more directly to issues raised by the respondents. John Paul Stevens wrote a separate concurring opinion, as did Antonin Scalia, who would have used a different test he had proposed in an earlier case to reach the same result.Outside commentators mostly praised the justices for this display of restraint, but Scalia criticized it harshly in his concurrence, calling it vague. He considered his fellow justices in "disregard of duty" for their refusal to address the Fourth Amendment issues. A month after the court handed down its decision, an appellate court in Georgia similarly criticized it for "a marked lack of clarity" as it narrowed an earlier ruling to remove a finding that there was no expectation of privacy in the contents of email. A New York Times article later summarized this criticism, and its "faux unanimity", as emblematic of what some judges and lawyers have found an increasingly frustrating trend in Roberts Court opinions.".
- Ontario_v._Quon thumbnail Alphadual.jpg?width=300.
- Ontario_v._Quon wikiPageExternalLink quon.
- Ontario_v._Quon wikiPageExternalLink city-of-ontario-v-quon.
- Ontario_v._Quon wikiPageExternalLink city-ontario-v-quon.
- Ontario_v._Quon wikiPageExternalLink 08-1332.pdf.
- Ontario_v._Quon wikiPageExternalLink 08-1332.pdf.
- Ontario_v._Quon wikiPageID "27748420".
- Ontario_v._Quon wikiPageRevisionID "602131653".
- Ontario_v._Quon arguedate "--04-19".
- Ontario_v._Quon argueyear "2010".
- Ontario_v._Quon citation "17280.0".
- Ontario_v._Quon concurrence "Scalia".
- Ontario_v._Quon concurrence "Stevens".
- Ontario_v._Quon decidedate "--06-17".
- Ontario_v._Quon decideyear "2010".
- Ontario_v._Quon docket "8".
- Ontario_v._Quon fullname "City of Ontario, California, et al. v. Quon et al.".
- Ontario_v._Quon hasPhotoCollection Ontario_v._Quon.
- Ontario_v._Quon holding "Discovery of sexually explicit and otherwise personal text messages sent from police department-owned pager, resulting in disciplinary action against officer pager had been issued to, was incident to reasonable, work-related audit intended to assess efficacy of monthly character limit.".
- Ontario_v._Quon holding "Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.".
- Ontario_v._Quon joinmajority "Roberts, Stevens, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor".
- Ontario_v._Quon lawsapplied Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Ontario_v._Quon majority "Kennedy".
- Ontario_v._Quon oralargument 08-1332.pdf.
- Ontario_v._Quon prior "25920.0".
- Ontario_v._Quon scotus "2009".
- Ontario_v._Quon subsequent "None".
- Ontario_v._Quon usvol "560".
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:Privacy_of_telecommunications.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:United_States_Internet_case_law.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:United_States_privacy_case_law.
- Ontario_v._Quon subject Category:United_States_public_employment_case_law.
- Ontario_v._Quon type Case.
- Ontario_v._Quon type LegalCase.
- Ontario_v._Quon type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Ontario_v._Quon type UnitOfWork.
- Ontario_v._Quon type Situation.
- Ontario_v._Quon comment "Ontario v. Quon, sometimes cited as City of Ontario v. Quon, 130 S.Ct. 2619, 560 U.S. ___ (2010), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the extent to which the right to privacy applies to electronic communications in a government workplace.".
- Ontario_v._Quon label "Ontario v. Quon".
- Ontario_v._Quon sameAs m.0cc9h8y.
- Ontario_v._Quon sameAs Q7095006.
- Ontario_v._Quon sameAs Q7095006.
- Ontario_v._Quon wasDerivedFrom Ontario_v._Quon?oldid=602131653.
- Ontario_v._Quon depiction Alphadual.jpg.
- Ontario_v._Quon isPrimaryTopicOf Ontario_v._Quon.
- Ontario_v._Quon name "City of Ontario, California, et al. v. Quon et al.".