Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 26 of
26
with 100 items per page.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation abstract "Pape v Commissioner of Taxation is an Australian court case concerning the constitutional validity of the Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No 2) 2009 (Cth) which seeks to give one-off payments of up to $900 to Australian taxpayers. The decision of the High Court of Australia was announced on 3 April 2009, with reasons to follow later.The plaintiff in the case, Bryan Pape, was a law lecturer and barrister who represented himself before the Court. He challenged the legislation on the ground that the payments, said to be a tax bonus, were actually a gift and were not supported by the taxation power in the Constitution. The Commonwealth argued that the legislation was supported by all or any combination of the appropriations "power" under s 81 of the Constitution, the taxation power (s 51(ii)), the external affairs power (s 51(xxix)), the trade or commerce power (s 51(i)) and the implied nationhood power.The Court by a margin of 4-3, Chief Justice French presiding, found that the Act was a valid law of the Commonwealth supported by a head of legislative power under the Constitution.".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation thumbnail Australian_coat_of_arms_1912_edit.png?width=300.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation wikiPageID "22233445".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation wikiPageRevisionID "594912846".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation court "High Court of Australia".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation dateDecided "2009-04-03".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation fullName "Bryan Reginald Pape v The Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia & The Commonwealth of Australia".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation hasPhotoCollection Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation judges "French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation name "Pape v Commissioner of Taxation".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation opinions "* the plaintiff has standing * the "Bonus Act" is a valid law of the Commonwealth * there is a valid appropriation within the meaning of the Constitution * per agreement of the parties, no order for costs".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation priorActions "none".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation subsequentActions "none".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation transcripts "; , ,".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation subject Category:2009_in_Australia.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation subject Category:2009_in_case_law.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation subject Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation subject Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation comment "Pape v Commissioner of Taxation is an Australian court case concerning the constitutional validity of the Tax Bonus for Working Australians Act (No 2) 2009 (Cth) which seeks to give one-off payments of up to $900 to Australian taxpayers. The decision of the High Court of Australia was announced on 3 April 2009, with reasons to follow later.The plaintiff in the case, Bryan Pape, was a law lecturer and barrister who represented himself before the Court.".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation label "Pape v Commissioner of Taxation".
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation sameAs m.05q5zd5.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation sameAs Q7132556.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation sameAs Q7132556.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation wasDerivedFrom Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation?oldid=594912846.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation depiction Australian_coat_of_arms_1912_edit.png.
- Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation isPrimaryTopicOf Pape_v_Commissioner_of_Taxation.
