Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Patently_unreasonable> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 26 of
26
with 100 items per page.
- Patently_unreasonable abstract "In Canadian law, patently unreasonable or the patent unreasonableness test was a standard of review used by a court when performing judicial review of administrative decisions. It was the highest of three standards of review: correctness, unreasonableness, and patent unreasonableness. Although the term "patent unreasonableness" lacked a precise definition in the common law, it was somewhere above unreasonableness, and consequently it was relatively difficult to show that a decision is patently unreasonable. A simple example of a patently unreasonable decision may be one that does not accord at all with the facts or law before it, or one that completely misstates a legal test.By a decision issued on March 7, 2008, this test was removed from the law by the Supreme Court of Canada in David Dunsmuir v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of New Brunswick as represented by Board of Management .In Toronto (City) Board of Education v. O.S.S.T.F., District 15, [1997] 1 S.C.R. 487, at paras. 41-48, the majority of the Supreme Court of Canada noted that the test for whether a decision under review is patently unreasonable is articulated differently for findings of fact and findings of law. For interpreting a legislative provision, the test was whether the decision under review "cannot be rationally supported by the relevant legislation and demands intervention by the court upon review". In the context of a decision interpreting a collective labour agreement, the patently-unreasonable test was held to mean that the court will not intervene unless the words of the collective agreement have been given an interpretation they cannot reasonably bear.When the reviewing court reviews the evidence that was before the original decision maker, on a question where the standard of review is patent unreasonableness, the reviewing court must determine whether "the evidence reasonably viewed is incapable of supporting the tribunal's findings" (para. 48).".
- Patently_unreasonable wikiPageID "223180".
- Patently_unreasonable wikiPageRevisionID "493298505".
- Patently_unreasonable hasPhotoCollection Patently_unreasonable.
- Patently_unreasonable subject Category:2008_disestablishments_in_Canada.
- Patently_unreasonable subject Category:Canadian_administrative_law.
- Patently_unreasonable subject Category:Legal_tests.
- Patently_unreasonable type Abstraction100002137.
- Patently_unreasonable type Cognition100023271.
- Patently_unreasonable type Experiment105798043.
- Patently_unreasonable type HigherCognitiveProcess105770664.
- Patently_unreasonable type Inquiry105797597.
- Patently_unreasonable type LegalTests.
- Patently_unreasonable type ProblemSolving105796750.
- Patently_unreasonable type Process105701363.
- Patently_unreasonable type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Patently_unreasonable type Thinking105770926.
- Patently_unreasonable type Trial105799212.
- Patently_unreasonable comment "In Canadian law, patently unreasonable or the patent unreasonableness test was a standard of review used by a court when performing judicial review of administrative decisions. It was the highest of three standards of review: correctness, unreasonableness, and patent unreasonableness.".
- Patently_unreasonable label "Patently unreasonable".
- Patently_unreasonable sameAs m.01gk84.
- Patently_unreasonable sameAs Q7144536.
- Patently_unreasonable sameAs Q7144536.
- Patently_unreasonable sameAs Patently_unreasonable.
- Patently_unreasonable wasDerivedFrom Patently_unreasonable?oldid=493298505.
- Patently_unreasonable isPrimaryTopicOf Patently_unreasonable.