Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Patriation_Reference> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 37 of
37
with 100 items per page.
- Patriation_Reference abstract "Reference re: Resolution to amend the Constitution – also known as the Patriation Reference – is a historic Supreme Court of Canada reference case that occurred during negotiations for the patriation of the Constitution of Canada.The Court affirmed the existence of an unwritten dimension to the Constitution and the majority held that by constitutional convention, amendments to the Constitution require a substantial degree of provincial consent. However, a differently-constituted majority of the court held that there was no legal barrier to the federal government seeking a constitutional amendment without any provincial consent.".
- Patriation_Reference wikiPageExternalLink index.do.
- Patriation_Reference wikiPageExternalLink peter-c-oliver-constitutional-conventions-in-the-canadian-courts.
- Patriation_Reference wikiPageID "3780262".
- Patriation_Reference wikiPageRevisionID "603889270".
- Patriation_Reference caseName "Patriation Reference".
- Patriation_Reference chiefJustice Bora_Laskin.
- Patriation_Reference citations "[1981] 1 SCR 753".
- Patriation_Reference decidedDate "1981-09-28".
- Patriation_Reference dissent "Constitutional Convention Issue: Laskin C.J., Estey and McIntyre JJ.".
- Patriation_Reference dissent "Constitutional Law Issue: Martland and Ritchie JJ.".
- Patriation_Reference fullCaseName "Re: Resolution to amend the Constitution".
- Patriation_Reference hasPhotoCollection Patriation_Reference.
- Patriation_Reference heardDate "--04-30".
- Patriation_Reference history "On appeal from decisions of the Quebec Court of Appeal, the Manitoba Court of Appeal, and the Newfoundland Court of Appeal".
- Patriation_Reference majority "Constitutional Convention Issue: Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Chouinard and Lamer JJ.".
- Patriation_Reference majority "Constitutional Law Issue: Laskin C.J., Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer JJ.".
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices Antonio_Lamer.
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices Brian_Dickson.
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices Jean_Beetz.
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices Julien_Chouinard.
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices Roland_Ritchie.
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices Ronald_Martland.
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices Willard_Estey.
- Patriation_Reference puisneJustices William_McIntyre_(judge).
- Patriation_Reference ratio "Issue 1: A majority of the Court held that as a matter of constitutional law, the federal Parliament could unilaterally request that the British Parliament amend the Canadian Constitution, without consent from the provinces.".
- Patriation_Reference ratio "Issue 2: A majority of the Court held that as a matter of constitutional law, a substantial degree of provincial consent was required for the amendment of the Canadian Constitution.".
- Patriation_Reference subject Category:1981_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Patriation_Reference subject Category:Canadian_constitutional_case_law.
- Patriation_Reference subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Patriation_Reference comment "Reference re: Resolution to amend the Constitution – also known as the Patriation Reference – is a historic Supreme Court of Canada reference case that occurred during negotiations for the patriation of the Constitution of Canada.The Court affirmed the existence of an unwritten dimension to the Constitution and the majority held that by constitutional convention, amendments to the Constitution require a substantial degree of provincial consent.".
- Patriation_Reference label "Patriation Reference".
- Patriation_Reference sameAs m.09_lq6.
- Patriation_Reference sameAs Q1230987.
- Patriation_Reference sameAs Q1230987.
- Patriation_Reference wasDerivedFrom Patriation_Reference?oldid=603889270.
- Patriation_Reference isPrimaryTopicOf Patriation_Reference.