Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pearson_v._Callahan> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 39 of
39
with 100 items per page.
- Pearson_v._Callahan abstract "Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.The Court took to the unusual step of asking the parties to argue whether past precedent should be overturned. The theory under that 2001 decision, Saucier v. Katz, is that without courts first ruling on constitutional questions, the law would go undeveloped in many areas. However, many legal commentators have criticized the ruling in Saucier.".
- Pearson_v._Callahan wikiPageID "19590950".
- Pearson_v._Callahan wikiPageRevisionID "594618572".
- Pearson_v._Callahan arguedate "--10-14".
- Pearson_v._Callahan argueyear "2008".
- Pearson_v._Callahan citation "17280.0".
- Pearson_v._Callahan decidedate "--01-21".
- Pearson_v._Callahan decideyear "2009".
- Pearson_v._Callahan docket "7".
- Pearson_v._Callahan fullname "Cordell Pearson, et al., Petitioners v. Afton Callahan".
- Pearson_v._Callahan hasPhotoCollection Pearson_v._Callahan.
- Pearson_v._Callahan holding "Saucier v. Katz's two-step process is no longer mandatory. Courts using that test may analyze the two steps in whatever order is most appropriate in a particular case.".
- Pearson_v._Callahan joinmajority "unanimous".
- Pearson_v._Callahan litigants "Pearson v. Callahan".
- Pearson_v._Callahan majority "Alito".
- Pearson_v._Callahan prior "25920.0".
- Pearson_v._Callahan scotus "2006".
- Pearson_v._Callahan subsequent "25920.0".
- Pearson_v._Callahan uspage "223".
- Pearson_v._Callahan usvol "555".
- Pearson_v._Callahan subject Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law.
- Pearson_v._Callahan subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- Pearson_v._Callahan subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Pearson_v._Callahan subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_decisions_that_overrule_a_prior_Supreme_Court_decision.
- Pearson_v._Callahan subject Category:United_States_constitutional_torts_case_law.
- Pearson_v._Callahan type Case.
- Pearson_v._Callahan type LegalCase.
- Pearson_v._Callahan type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Pearson_v._Callahan type UnitOfWork.
- Pearson_v._Callahan type Event.
- Pearson_v._Callahan type Situation.
- Pearson_v._Callahan comment "Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court.The Court took to the unusual step of asking the parties to argue whether past precedent should be overturned. The theory under that 2001 decision, Saucier v. Katz, is that without courts first ruling on constitutional questions, the law would go undeveloped in many areas. However, many legal commentators have criticized the ruling in Saucier.".
- Pearson_v._Callahan label "Pearson v. Callahan".
- Pearson_v._Callahan sameAs m.04n2y72.
- Pearson_v._Callahan sameAs Q7158379.
- Pearson_v._Callahan sameAs Q7158379.
- Pearson_v._Callahan wasDerivedFrom Pearson_v._Callahan?oldid=594618572.
- Pearson_v._Callahan isPrimaryTopicOf Pearson_v._Callahan.
- Pearson_v._Callahan name "Cordell Pearson, et al., Petitioners v. Afton Callahan".