Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pegram_v._Herdrich> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich abstract "Pegram v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that ERISA does not provide a remedy for coverage determinations by health maintenance organizations. The case is important because, by excluding suits involving coverage determinations from the ERISA regime, state law remedies are not preempted by the legislation.".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich wikiPageID "20590906".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich wikiPageRevisionID "576096644".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich arguedate "--02-23".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich argueyear "2000".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich citation "120".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich decidedate "--06-12".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich decideyear "2000".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich fullname "Lori Pegram, et al., Petitioners v. Cynthia Herdrich".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich hasPhotoCollection Pegram_v._Herdrich.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich holding "Because mixed treatment and eligibility decisions by HMO physicians are not fiduciary decisions under ERISA, Herdrich does not state an ERISA claim.".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich joinmajority "unanimous".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich litigants "Pegram v. Herdrich".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich majority "Souter".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich scotus "1994".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich uspage "211".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich usvol "530".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich subject Category:2000_in_United_States_case_law.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich subject Category:Employee_Retirement_Income_Security_Act.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich type Case.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich type LegalCase.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich type UnitOfWork.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich type Event.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich type Situation.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich comment "Pegram v. Herdrich, 530 U.S. 211 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that ERISA does not provide a remedy for coverage determinations by health maintenance organizations. The case is important because, by excluding suits involving coverage determinations from the ERISA regime, state law remedies are not preempted by the legislation.".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich label "Pegram v. Herdrich".
- Pegram_v._Herdrich sameAs m.051_xm0.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich sameAs Q7160811.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich sameAs Q7160811.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich wasDerivedFrom Pegram_v._Herdrich?oldid=576096644.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich isPrimaryTopicOf Pegram_v._Herdrich.
- Pegram_v._Herdrich name "Lori Pegram, et al., Petitioners v. Cynthia Herdrich".