Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Peruta_v._San_Diego> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 27 of
27
with 100 items per page.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego abstract "Peruta v. San Diego is a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy requiring that residents provide documentation of good cause that distinguishes the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way before issuing a concealed carry permit. Under San Diego's restrictive policy a "'typical' responsible, law-abiding citizen in San Diego County cannot bear arms in public for self-defense" because by San Diego's definition a typical citizen fearing for his or her personal safety cannot '"distinguish [himself] from the mainstream'" and receive a concealed carry permit. (Peruta v San Diego (9th Cir, 02-13-14) p. 54.) And California does not allow the open carry of firearms whether loaded or unloaded. (Cal. Pen. Code §§ 25850, 26155.) Thus, the Court found San Diego County's restrictive policy in combination with California's denial of open carry ultimately resulted in the destruction of the typical law abiding responsible citizen's right to bear arms in any manner in public thereby violating the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution. The decision is written by Diarmuid O'Scannlain, with Consuelo María Callahan joining and Sidney Runyan Thomas dissenting, and affirms the right of responsible, law-abiding citizens to carry a handgun in public for lawful self-defense. Unless overridden, this decision will force California to become a shall-issue state in regards to concealed carry. The primary Plaintiff, Mr. Edward Peruta's attorneys were Paul Neuharth, Jr. from San Diego and Chuck Michel from Long Beach. The San Diego County Sheriff's Department has issued a press release dated February 21, 2014 stating it will not seek review of the decision by the entire membership of judges sitting in the Ninth Circuit, and "Should the decision of the Ninth Circuit become final, the Sheriff's Department will begin to issue CCW's in situations where the applicant has met all other lawful qualifications and has requested a CCW for purposes of self-defense." As a result of the court's decision, the Orange County Sheriff has loosened requirements for obtaining a concealed carry permit. Instead of requiring the applicant to have "good cause", the applicant will only have to assert that they need a permit for self-defense or personal safety.On February 27, 2014 California Attorney General Kamala Harris filed a petition for en-banc review of the decision. As the state was not a formal party of the case, her action is not an appeal, but merely a request that the full court re-hear the case en-banc on its own initiative.".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego wikiPageExternalLink Peruta_v._County_of_San_Diego.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego wikiPageExternalLink Sykes_v._McGinness.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego wikiPageExternalLink view.php?pk_id=0000000722.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego wikiPageID "41940007".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego wikiPageRevisionID "605255614".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego concurring "Consuelo María Callahan".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego court United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego dateDecided "2014-02-13".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego decisionBy "Diarmuid O'Scannlain".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego dissenting "Sidney Runyan Thomas".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego italicTitle "yes".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego judges "Diarmuid O'Scannlain, Consuelo María Callahan, and Sidney Runyan Thomas".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego keywords "*Concealed carry *Right to keep and bear arms *Second Amendment".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego name "Peruta v. San Diego".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego numberOfJudges "3".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego subject Category:California_law.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego subject Category:Self-defense.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego subject Category:United_States_Second_Amendment_case_law.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego comment "Peruta v. San Diego is a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pertaining to the legality of San Diego County's restrictive policy requiring that residents provide documentation of good cause that distinguishes the applicant from the mainstream and places the applicant in harm's way before issuing a concealed carry permit.".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego label "Peruta v. San Diego".
- Peruta_v._San_Diego sameAs m.0_qczyh.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego sameAs Q17074691.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego sameAs Q17074691.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego wasDerivedFrom Peruta_v._San_Diego?oldid=605255614.
- Peruta_v._San_Diego isPrimaryTopicOf Peruta_v._San_Diego.