Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations abstract "Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 (1973), is a 1973 decision of the United States Supreme Court which upheld an ordinance enacted in Pittsburgh that forbids sex-designated classified advertising for job opportunities, against a claim by the parent company of the Pittsburgh Press that the ordinance violated its First Amendment rights.".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations wikiPageID "23796657".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations wikiPageRevisionID "589988460".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations arguedate "--03-20".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations argueyear "1973".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations decidedate "--06-21".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations decideyear "1972".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations dissent "Blackmun".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations dissent "Burger".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations dissent "Douglas".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations dissent "Stewart".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations fullname "Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations hasPhotoCollection Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations holding "A Pittsburgh ordinance, as construed to forbid newspapers to carry sex-designated advertising columns for nonexempt job opportunities, does not violate petitioner's First Amendment rights".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations joindissent "Douglas".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations joinmajority "Brennan, Marshall, Rehnquist, White".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations litigants "Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations majority "Powell".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations prior "Cert. to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations scotus "1972".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations uspage "376".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations usvol "413".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations subject Category:1973_in_United_States_case_law.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations subject Category:National_Organization_for_Women.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations subject Category:Sex_segregation.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations subject Category:United_States_commercial_speech_case_law.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations type Case.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations type LegalCase.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations type UnitOfWork.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations type Event.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations type Situation.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations comment "Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations, 413 U.S. 376 (1973), is a 1973 decision of the United States Supreme Court which upheld an ordinance enacted in Pittsburgh that forbids sex-designated classified advertising for job opportunities, against a claim by the parent company of the Pittsburgh Press that the ordinance violated its First Amendment rights.".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations label "Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations".
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations sameAs m.06_xn5s.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations sameAs Q7199374.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations sameAs Q7199374.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations wasDerivedFrom Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations?oldid=589988460.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations isPrimaryTopicOf Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations.
- Pittsburgh_Press_Co._v._Pittsburgh_Commission_on_Human_Relations name "Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations".