Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Post-processual_archaeology> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 22 of
22
with 100 items per page.
- Post-processual_archaeology abstract "Post-processual archaeology, which is sometimes alternately referred to as the interpretative archaeologies by its adherents, is a movement in archaeological theory that emphasizes the subjectivity of archaeological interpretations. Despite having a vague series of similarities, post-processualism consists of "very diverse strands of thought coalesced into a loose cluster of traditions". Within the post-processualist movement, a wide variety of theoretical viewpoints have been embraced, including structuralism and Neo-Marxism, as have a variety of different archaeological techniques, such as phenomenology.The post-processual movement originated in the United Kingdom during the late 1970s and early 1980s, pioneered by archaeologists such as Ian Hodder, Daniel Miller, Christopher Tilley and Peter Ucko, who were influenced by French Marxist anthropology, postmodernism and similar trends in sociocultural anthropology. Parallel developments soon followed in the United States. Initially post-processualism was primarily a reaction to and critique of processual archaeology, a paradigm developed in the 1960s by 'New Archaeologists' such as Lewis Binford, and which had become dominant in Anglophone archaeology by the 1970s. Post-processualism was heavily critical of a key tenet of processualism, namely its assertion that archaeological interpretations could, if the scientific method was applied, come to completely objective conclusions. Post-processualists also criticized previous archaeological work for overemphasizing materialist interpretations of the past and being ethically and politically irresponsible.In the United States, archaeologists widely see post-processualism as an accompaniment to the processual movement, while in the United Kingdom, they remain largely thought of as separate and opposing theoretical movements. In other parts of the world, post-processualism has made less of an impact on archaeological thought. Various archaeologists have criticized post-processual archaeology, for a variety of reasons.".
- Post-processual_archaeology wikiPageID "160139".
- Post-processual_archaeology wikiPageRevisionID "606596611".
- Post-processual_archaeology hasPhotoCollection Post-processual_archaeology.
- Post-processual_archaeology subject Category:Archaeological_theory.
- Post-processual_archaeology subject Category:Postmodern_terminology.
- Post-processual_archaeology subject Category:Postmodern_theory.
- Post-processual_archaeology comment "Post-processual archaeology, which is sometimes alternately referred to as the interpretative archaeologies by its adherents, is a movement in archaeological theory that emphasizes the subjectivity of archaeological interpretations. Despite having a vague series of similarities, post-processualism consists of "very diverse strands of thought coalesced into a loose cluster of traditions".".
- Post-processual_archaeology label "Archeologia post-processuale".
- Post-processual_archaeology label "Arqueología postprocesual".
- Post-processual_archaeology label "Post-processual archaeology".
- Post-processual_archaeology label "Postprozessuale Archäologie".
- Post-processual_archaeology label "Пост-процессуальная археология".
- Post-processual_archaeology label "后过程主义考古学".
- Post-processual_archaeology sameAs Postprozessuale_Archäologie.
- Post-processual_archaeology sameAs Arqueología_postprocesual.
- Post-processual_archaeology sameAs Archeologia_post-processuale.
- Post-processual_archaeology sameAs m.0154sr.
- Post-processual_archaeology sameAs Q1489098.
- Post-processual_archaeology sameAs Q1489098.
- Post-processual_archaeology wasDerivedFrom Post-processual_archaeology?oldid=606596611.
- Post-processual_archaeology isPrimaryTopicOf Post-processual_archaeology.