Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 17 of
17
with 100 items per page.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM abstract "Procter & Gamble v. Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (the "Baby Dry" case)Procter & Gamble filled a form to OHIM to register BABY DRY as a trademark for a brand of baby diapers.OHIM refused the registration saying that BABY DRY wasn't distinctive; it was descriptive without secondary meaning.The Court ruled that trademarks consisting of certain word combinations, not used in common parlance to designate the relevant goods or services or their essential characteristics, may be deemed lexical inventions bestowing distinctive power on the Trademark so formed and may not be refused registration on the grounds that such marks are solely descriptive and non-distinctive.".
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM wikiPageID "39379965".
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM wikiPageRevisionID "605669085".
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM subject Category:1998_in_case_law.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM subject Category:Diapers.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM subject Category:European_Union_case_law.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM subject Category:Lawsuits.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM subject Category:Procter_&_Gamble.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM subject Category:Trademark_case_law.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM subject Category:Trials.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM comment "Procter & Gamble v.".
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM label "Procter & Gamble Co. v. OHIM".
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM sameAs m.0vsdl2x.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM sameAs Q17092549.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM sameAs Q17092549.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM wasDerivedFrom Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM?oldid=605669085.
- Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM isPrimaryTopicOf Procter_&_Gamble_Co._v._OHIM.