Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Reliability_of_Wikipedia> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia abstract "The reliability of Wikipedia (primarily of the English-language edition), compared to other encyclopedias and more specialized sources, has been assessed in many ways, including statistically, through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in the editing process unique to Wikipedia.Several studies have been done to assess the reliability of Wikipedia. An early study in the journal Nature said that in 2005, Wikipedia scientific articles came close to the level of accuracy in Encyclopædia Britannica and had a similar rate of "serious errors". The study by Nature was disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica, and later Nature replied to this refutation with both a formal response and a point-by-point rebuttal of Britannica's main objections. Between 2008 and 2012, articles in medical and scientific fields such as pathology, toxicology, oncology, pharmaceuticals, and psychiatry comparing Wikipedia to professional and peer-reviewed sources found that Wikipedia's depth and coverage were of a high standard. According to a study published in the European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, however, Wikipedia articles about gastroenterology and hepatology were not reliable for medical students. Concerns regarding readability were raised in a study published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and a study published in Psychological Medicine (2012).Wikipedia is open to anonymous and collaborative editing, so assessments of its reliability usually include examination of how quickly false or misleading information is removed. An early study conducted by IBM researchers in 2003—two years following Wikipedia's establishment—found that "vandalism is usually repaired extremely quickly—so quickly that most users will never see its effects" and concluded that Wikipedia had "surprisingly effective self-healing capabilities". A 2007 peer-reviewed study stated that "42% of damage is repaired almost immediately... Nonetheless, there are still hundreds of millions of damaged views."Several incidents have also been publicized in which false information has lasted for a long time in Wikipedia. In May 2005, in the Wikipedia biography controversy, a user added several false and defamatory statements to the biographical article John Seigenthaler. The inaccurate information went unnoticed until September 2005, when they were discovered by a friend of Seigenthaler. After the information was removed from Wikipedia, it remained for another three weeks on sites that mirror Wikipedia content. A biographical article in French Wikipedia portrayed a "Léon-Robert de L'Astran" as an 18th-century anti-slavery ship owner, which led Ségolène Royal, a presidential candidate, to praise him. A student investigation later determined that the article was a hoax and de L'Astran had never existed.".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia thumbnail Wikipedia_vandalism.svg?width=300.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink index.php?title=Sarah_Palin&diff=234778085&oldid=234741793.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink Wikipedia.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink wikitrust.soe.ucsc.edu.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink 2010-june-cancer-information.aspx.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wikiPageExternalLink www.wikirage.com.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wikiPageID "6014851".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wikiPageRevisionID "606462502".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia expiry "2014-11-21".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia hasPhotoCollection Reliability_of_Wikipedia.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia small "yes".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia subject Category:Wikipedia.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia subject Category:Wikipedia_reliability.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia comment "The reliability of Wikipedia (primarily of the English-language edition), compared to other encyclopedias and more specialized sources, has been assessed in many ways, including statistically, through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in the editing process unique to Wikipedia.Several studies have been done to assess the reliability of Wikipedia.".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia label "Confiabilidade da Wikipédia".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia label "Fiabilité de Wikipédia en anglais".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia label "Reliability of Wikipedia".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia label "Достоверность Википедии".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia label "维基百科的可靠性".
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia sameAs Fiabilité_de_Wikipédia_en_anglais.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia sameAs Keandalan_Wikipedia.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia sameAs Confiabilidade_da_Wikipédia.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia sameAs m.0fkn_x.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia sameAs Q195951.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia sameAs Q195951.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia wasDerivedFrom Reliability_of_Wikipedia?oldid=606462502.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia depiction Wikipedia_vandalism.svg.
- Reliability_of_Wikipedia isPrimaryTopicOf Reliability_of_Wikipedia.
