Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County abstract "Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a criminal defendant's initial appearance before a magistrate judge, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to restriction, marks the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings that trigger attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Attachment does not also require that a prosecutor (as distinct from a police officer) be aware of that initial proceeding or involved in its conduct.".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County wikiPageID "24404631".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County wikiPageRevisionID "504207156".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County arguedate "--03-17".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County argueyear "2008".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County citation "172800.0".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County concurrence "Alito".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County concurrence "Roberts".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County decidedate "--06-23".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County decideyear "2008".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County dissent "Thomas".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County fullname "Walter A. Rothgery, Petitioner v. Gillespie County, Texas".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County hasPhotoCollection Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County holding "A criminal defendant’s initial appearance before a magistrate judge, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to restriction, marks the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings that trigger attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Attachment does not also require that a prosecutor be aware of that initial proceeding or involved in its conduct.".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County joinconcurrence "Roberts, Scalia".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County joinconcurrence "Scalia".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County joinmajority "Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County litigants "Rothgery v. Gillespie County".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County majority "Souter".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County scotus "2006".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County uspage "191".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County usvol "554".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County subject Category:2008_in_United_States_case_law.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County type Case.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County type LegalCase.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County type UnitOfWork.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County type Event.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County type Situation.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County comment "Rothgery v. Gillespie County, 554 U.S. 191 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a criminal defendant's initial appearance before a magistrate judge, where he learns the charge against him and his liberty is subject to restriction, marks the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings that trigger attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County label "Rothgery v. Gillespie County".
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County sameAs m.07sbtxm.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County sameAs Q7370473.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County sameAs Q7370473.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County wasDerivedFrom Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County?oldid=504207156.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County isPrimaryTopicOf Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County.
- Rothgery_v._Gillespie_County name "Walter A. Rothgery, Petitioner v. Gillespie County, Texas".