Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Shaw_v._Reno> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 54 of
54
with 100 items per page.
- Shaw_v._Reno abstract "Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993. The ruling was significant in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause. On the other hand, bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act. The redistricting that occurred after the 2000 census was the first nationwide redistricting to apply the results of Shaw v. Reno.".
- Shaw_v._Reno thumbnail North_Carolina_12th_Congressional_District_(National_Atlas).gif?width=300.
- Shaw_v._Reno wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=509&page=630.
- Shaw_v._Reno wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Shaw_v._Reno wikiPageExternalLink 92-357.ZS.html.
- Shaw_v._Reno wikiPageID "4519636".
- Shaw_v._Reno wikiPageRevisionID "602147755".
- Shaw_v._Reno arguedate "--04-20".
- Shaw_v._Reno argueyear "1993".
- Shaw_v._Reno case "Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630".
- Shaw_v._Reno citation "172800.0".
- Shaw_v._Reno decidedate "--06-28".
- Shaw_v._Reno decideyear "1993".
- Shaw_v._Reno dissent "Blackmun".
- Shaw_v._Reno dissent "Souter".
- Shaw_v._Reno dissent "Stevens".
- Shaw_v._Reno dissent "White".
- Shaw_v._Reno findlaw getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=509&page=630.
- Shaw_v._Reno fullname "Ruth O. Shaw, et al., Appellants v. Janet Reno, Attorney General et al.".
- Shaw_v._Reno hasPhotoCollection Shaw_v._Reno.
- Shaw_v._Reno holding "Redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.".
- Shaw_v._Reno joindissent "Blackmun, Stevens".
- Shaw_v._Reno joinmajority "Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas".
- Shaw_v._Reno justia case.html.
- Shaw_v._Reno litigants "Shaw v. Reno".
- Shaw_v._Reno majority "O'Connor".
- Shaw_v._Reno otherSource "LII".
- Shaw_v._Reno otherUrl 92-357.ZS.html.
- Shaw_v._Reno prior "Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, 808 F.Supp. 461".
- Shaw_v._Reno scotus "1991".
- Shaw_v._Reno subsequent "808".
- Shaw_v._Reno uspage "630".
- Shaw_v._Reno usvol "509".
- Shaw_v._Reno subject Category:1993_in_United_States_case_law.
- Shaw_v._Reno subject Category:Gerrymandering.
- Shaw_v._Reno subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Shaw_v._Reno subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court.
- Shaw_v._Reno subject Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Shaw_v._Reno subject Category:United_States_equal_protection_case_law.
- Shaw_v._Reno type Case.
- Shaw_v._Reno type LegalCase.
- Shaw_v._Reno type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Shaw_v._Reno type UnitOfWork.
- Shaw_v._Reno type Event.
- Shaw_v._Reno type Situation.
- Shaw_v._Reno comment "Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a United States Supreme Court case argued on April 20, 1993. The ruling was significant in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause. On the other hand, bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.".
- Shaw_v._Reno label "Shaw v. Reno".
- Shaw_v._Reno sameAs m.0c6v5m.
- Shaw_v._Reno sameAs Q7491211.
- Shaw_v._Reno sameAs Q7491211.
- Shaw_v._Reno wasDerivedFrom Shaw_v._Reno?oldid=602147755.
- Shaw_v._Reno depiction North_Carolina_12th_Congressional_District_(National_Atlas).gif.
- Shaw_v._Reno isPrimaryTopicOf Shaw_v._Reno.
- Shaw_v._Reno name "Ruth O. Shaw, et al., Appellants v. Janet Reno, Attorney General et al.".