Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Smith_v._Doe> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- Smith_v._Doe abstract "Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003), was a court case in the United States which questioned the constitutionality of the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act's retroactive requirements. Under the Act, any sex offender must register with the Department of Corrections or local law enforcement within one business day of entering the state. This information is forwarded to the Department of Public Safety, which maintains a public database. Fingerprints, social security number, anticipated change of address, and medical treatment after the offense are kept confidential. The offender's name, aliases, address, photograph, physical description, driver's license number, motor vehicle identification numbers, place of employment, date of birth, crime, date and place of conviction, and length and conditions of sentence are part of the public record, maintained on the Internet.Smith v. Doe questioned the constitutionality of the act's retroactive requirements. John Does I and II were convicted of aggravated assault before the act's passage and filed suit, claiming the act was punitive and violated the ex post facto clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution. The district court ruled against the Does, ruling that the act was nonpunitive. The appeals court sided with the Does that the act was in fact punitive and violated ex post facto.".
- Smith_v._Doe wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=us&vol=538&invol=84.
- Smith_v._Doe wikiPageExternalLink 01-729.ZS.html.
- Smith_v._Doe wikiPageID "2285594".
- Smith_v._Doe wikiPageRevisionID "603344572".
- Smith_v._Doe arguedate "--11-13".
- Smith_v._Doe argueyear "2002".
- Smith_v._Doe concurrence "Souter".
- Smith_v._Doe concurrence "Thomas".
- Smith_v._Doe decidedate "--03-05".
- Smith_v._Doe decideyear "2003".
- Smith_v._Doe dissent "Ginsburg".
- Smith_v._Doe dissent "Stevens".
- Smith_v._Doe fullname "Delbert W. Smith and Bruce M. Botelho, Petitioners v. John Doe I et al.".
- Smith_v._Doe hasPhotoCollection Smith_v._Doe.
- Smith_v._Doe holding "Because the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act is nonpunitive, its retroactive application does not violate the ex post facto clause.".
- Smith_v._Doe joindissent "Breyer".
- Smith_v._Doe joinmajority "Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas".
- Smith_v._Doe litigants "Smith v. Doe".
- Smith_v._Doe majority "Kennedy".
- Smith_v._Doe scotus "1994".
- Smith_v._Doe uspage "84".
- Smith_v._Doe usvol "538".
- Smith_v._Doe subject Category:2003_in_United_States_case_law.
- Smith_v._Doe subject Category:2003_in_the_United_States.
- Smith_v._Doe subject Category:Ex_post_facto_case_law.
- Smith_v._Doe subject Category:Sex_offender_registration.
- Smith_v._Doe subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Smith_v._Doe type Case.
- Smith_v._Doe type LegalCase.
- Smith_v._Doe type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Smith_v._Doe type UnitOfWork.
- Smith_v._Doe type Event.
- Smith_v._Doe type Situation.
- Smith_v._Doe comment "Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003), was a court case in the United States which questioned the constitutionality of the Alaska Sex Offender Registration Act's retroactive requirements. Under the Act, any sex offender must register with the Department of Corrections or local law enforcement within one business day of entering the state. This information is forwarded to the Department of Public Safety, which maintains a public database.".
- Smith_v._Doe label "Smith v. Doe".
- Smith_v._Doe sameAs m.070y1t.
- Smith_v._Doe sameAs Q7545399.
- Smith_v._Doe sameAs Q7545399.
- Smith_v._Doe wasDerivedFrom Smith_v._Doe?oldid=603344572.
- Smith_v._Doe isPrimaryTopicOf Smith_v._Doe.
- Smith_v._Doe name "Delbert W. Smith and Bruce M. Botelho, Petitioners v. John Doe I et al.".