Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sternberg_peer_review_controversy> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy abstract "The Sternberg peer review controversy concerns the conflict arising from the publication of an article supporting the controversial concept of intelligent design in a scientific journal, and the subsequent questions of whether proper editorial procedures had been followed and whether it was properly peer reviewed.One of the primary criticisms of the intelligent design movement is that there are no research papers supporting their positions in peer reviewed scientific journals. On 4 August 2004, an article by Stephen C. Meyer (Director of Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture) titled "The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories", appeared in the peer-reviewed journal, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. Meyer's article was a literature review article, and contained no new primary scholarship itself on the topic of intelligent design. The following month, the publisher of the journal, the Council of the Biological Society of Washington, released a statement repudiating the article and stating that their former editor Richard M. Sternberg had, in an unusual manner, handled the entire review process without consultation or review from an associate editor. The position of editor was unpaid and voluntary, and Sternberg had put in his resignation from it six months earlier. Sternberg disputes the Council's statement and asserts that the paper was appropriately peer reviewed by three biologists who "concluded that [the paper] warranted publication".The same statement from the Council vowed that proper review procedures would be followed in the future and endorsed a resolution published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, which states that there is no credible scientific evidence supporting intelligent design. On September 18, the Discovery Institute issued a statement exulting over the publication of Meyer's paper in a peer-reviewed journal and chastising the National Center for Science Education for stating that the paper should not have been published. The Biological Society of Washington's president, Roy McDiarmid called Sternberg's decision to publish Meyer's article "a really bad judgment call on the editor's part" and said it was doubtful whether the three scientists who peer reviewed the article and recommended it for publication were evolutionary biologists.".
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy wikiPageExternalLink index.php?command=view&id=2177&program=CSC&callingPage=discoMainPage.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy wikiPageExternalLink c14871.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy wikiPageExternalLink www.richardsternberg.com.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy wikiPageID "3140813".
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy wikiPageRevisionID "599820306".
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy hasPhotoCollection Sternberg_peer_review_controversy.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy subject Category:Discovery_Institute_campaigns.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy subject Category:Intelligent_design_controversies.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy subject Category:Peer_review.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy subject Category:Smithsonian_Institution.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Abstraction100002137.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Act100030358.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Contest107456188.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Controversy107183151.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Disagreement107180787.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type DiscoveryInstituteCampaigns.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Dispute107181935.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Event100029378.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type IntelligentDesignControversies.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type PoliticalCampaign107472929.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Race107472657.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type SocialEvent107288639.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type SpeechAct107160883.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Agent.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Person.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Person.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Q215627.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Q5.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Agent.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type NaturalPerson.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Thing.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy type Person.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy comment "The Sternberg peer review controversy concerns the conflict arising from the publication of an article supporting the controversial concept of intelligent design in a scientific journal, and the subsequent questions of whether proper editorial procedures had been followed and whether it was properly peer reviewed.One of the primary criticisms of the intelligent design movement is that there are no research papers supporting their positions in peer reviewed scientific journals.".
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy label "Sternberg peer review controversy".
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy sameAs m.08v021.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy sameAs Q7611551.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy sameAs Q7611551.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy sameAs Sternberg_peer_review_controversy.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy wasDerivedFrom Sternberg_peer_review_controversy?oldid=599820306.
- Sternberg_peer_review_controversy isPrimaryTopicOf Sternberg_peer_review_controversy.