Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 items per page.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd abstract "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1971) 124 CLR 468, also known as the Concrete Pipes Case, is a High Court of Australia case that discusses the scope of the corporations power in section 51(xx) of the Australian Constitution. This was an important case in Australian constitutional law because it overruled the decision in the earlier case of Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead (1909) 8 CLR 330, which held that the corporations power only extended as far as the regulation of their conduct in relation to their transactions with or affecting the public. Since this case, the Commonwealth has had at least the ability to regulate the trading activities of trading corporations, thus opening the way for an expansion in Commonwealth power.The width of this power was later considered again in the cases of Actors and Announcers Equity Association v Fontana Films (1982) 150 CLR 169, Commonwealth v Tasmania (the Tasmanian Dam Case) (1983) 158 CLR 1, Re Dingjan; Ex parte Wagner (1995) 183 CLR 323 and New South Wales v Commonwealth (the WorkChoices Case) (2006) 229 CLR 1.".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd thumbnail Australian_coat_of_arms_1912_edit.png?width=300.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageExternalLink 124clr468.html.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageID "4954116".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wikiPageRevisionID "604269504".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd citations 124clr468.html.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd court High_Court_of_Australia.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd dateDecided "1971-09-03".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd fullName "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd hasPhotoCollection Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd judges "Barwick CJ, McTiernan, Menzies, Windeyer, Owen, Walsh and Gibbs JJ".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd name "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd opinions "The restrictions placed over Commonwealth power to regulate constitutional corporations, from Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead 8 CLR 330, have been overturned, and the Commonwealth may regulate trading activities of trading corporations".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd priorActions "none".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subsequentActions "none".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:1971_in_Australia.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:1971_in_case_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:Australian_constitutional_law.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:Corporations_power_in_the_Australian_Constitution_cases.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd subject Category:High_Court_of_Australia_cases.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd comment "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd (1971) 124 CLR 468, also known as the Concrete Pipes Case, is a High Court of Australia case that discusses the scope of the corporations power in section 51(xx) of the Australian Constitution.".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd label "Strickland v Rocla Concrete Pipes Ltd".
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd sameAs m.0cwwzv.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd sameAs Q7623602.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd sameAs Q7623602.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd wasDerivedFrom Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd?oldid=604269504.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd depiction Australian_coat_of_arms_1912_edit.png.
- Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd isPrimaryTopicOf Strickland_v_Rocla_Concrete_Pipes_Ltd.
