Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Turner_v._Safley> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- Turner_v._Safley abstract "Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of two prison regulations. Citing the reduced liberty and greater security needs of the prison context, the Court declined to use the strict scrutiny standard of review. It upheld a regulation that allowed prison officials to prohibit inmates at one prison from corresponding with those at another in certain cases, calling it "reasonable and facially valid". It struck down another regulation that prohibited inmates from marrying without the permission of the warden, finding that it was "not...reasonably related to legitimate penological objectives" and "impermissibly burdened" their right to marry. This decision is in line with the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. Virginia that the right to marry is a fundamental right protected by the liberty element of the due process clause.".
- Turner_v._Safley wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=US&vol=482&invol=78.
- Turner_v._Safley wikiPageID "1470171".
- Turner_v._Safley wikiPageRevisionID "581728536".
- Turner_v._Safley arguedate "--01-13".
- Turner_v._Safley argueyear "1987".
- Turner_v._Safley citation "172800.0".
- Turner_v._Safley dissent "Stevens".
- Turner_v._Safley decidedate "--06-01".
- Turner_v._Safley decideyear "1987".
- Turner_v._Safley fullname "William R. Turner, et al. v. Leonard Safley, et al.".
- Turner_v._Safley hasPhotoCollection Turner_v._Safley.
- Turner_v._Safley holding "A Missouri prison regulation restricting inmates from marrying without permission violated their constitutional right to marry because it was not logically related to a legitimate penological concern, but a prohibition on inmate-to-inmate correspondence was justified by prison security needs and so was permissible under the First Amendment, as applied through the Fourteenth. Eighth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.".
- Turner_v._Safley dissent "Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun".
- Turner_v._Safley joinmajority "Rehnquist, White, Powell, Scalia; Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens".
- Turner_v._Safley lawsapplied First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Turner_v._Safley lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Turner_v._Safley litigants "Turner v. Safley".
- Turner_v._Safley majority "O'Connor".
- Turner_v._Safley prior "17280.0".
- Turner_v._Safley scotus "1986".
- Turner_v._Safley uspage "78".
- Turner_v._Safley usvol "482".
- Turner_v._Safley subject Category:1987_in_United_States_case_law.
- Turner_v._Safley subject Category:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law.
- Turner_v._Safley subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Turner_v._Safley type Case.
- Turner_v._Safley type LegalCase.
- Turner_v._Safley type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Turner_v._Safley type UnitOfWork.
- Turner_v._Safley type Event.
- Turner_v._Safley type Situation.
- Turner_v._Safley comment "Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78 (1987), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision involving the constitutionality of two prison regulations. Citing the reduced liberty and greater security needs of the prison context, the Court declined to use the strict scrutiny standard of review. It upheld a regulation that allowed prison officials to prohibit inmates at one prison from corresponding with those at another in certain cases, calling it "reasonable and facially valid".".
- Turner_v._Safley label "Turner v. Safley".
- Turner_v._Safley sameAs m.054199.
- Turner_v._Safley sameAs Q7855974.
- Turner_v._Safley sameAs Q7855974.
- Turner_v._Safley wasDerivedFrom Turner_v._Safley?oldid=581728536.
- Turner_v._Safley isPrimaryTopicOf Turner_v._Safley.
- Turner_v._Safley name "William R. Turner, et al. v. Leonard Safley, et al.".