Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden abstract "Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia v. Bryden is a famous Canadian constitutional decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council where the exclusivity principle in Canadian federalism and pith and substance analysis was first articulated.Bryden was a shareholder in Union Colliery, a coal mining company in British Columbia, and was troubled by the company's practice of employing "Chinamen" and putting them into positions of authority. He sought an injunction against the company for violating section 4 of the provincial Coal Mines Regulation Act of 1890, which prohibited hiring "Chinamen" to work in coal mines. Union Colliery challenged the constitutionality of Act, arguing that the prohibition related to matters of naturalization and was under the jurisdiction of the federal government under section 91(25) of the British North America Act, 1867. Bryden, however, argued that since the federal government had no laws covering the matter the province was allowed to step in and legislate on it. The issue before the Council was whether the provinces could legislate in matters under federal jurisdiction where the federal government has remained silent.The Council held that the pith and substance of the provision was in relation to "aliens and naturalized subjects" and did fall within the federal jurisdiction. They also held that the federal government did not need to pass laws in all areas within their jurisdiction, and under the exclusivity principle the province can never intrude upon the federal jurisdiction. It is only where the two governments make an explicit agreement can the province legislate in federal matters.".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden wikiPageID "3784533".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden wikiPageRevisionID "558910715".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden appealedFrom Supreme_Court_of_British_Columbia.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden citations "[1899] UKPC 58, [1899] AC 580".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden court Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden dateDecided "1899-07-28".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden decisionBy William_Watson,_Baron_Watson.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden fullName "Union Colliery Company of British Columbia, Limited and others v John Bryden".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden hasPhotoCollection Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden judges Arthur_Hobhouse,_1st_Baron_Hobhouse.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden judges Edward_Fry.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden judges Edward_Macnaghten,_Baron_Macnaghten.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden judges Richard_Couch.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden judges William_Watson,_Baron_Watson.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden name "Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia v. Bryden".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden numberOfJudges "5".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden subject Category:1899_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden subject Category:Anti-discrimination_law_in_Canada.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden subject Category:British_Columbia_law.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden subject Category:Canadian_civil_rights_case_law.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden subject Category:Canadian_federalism_case_law.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden subject Category:History_of_Chinese_Canadians.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden subject Category:Judicial_Committee_of_the_Privy_Council_cases_on_appeal_from_Canada.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden comment "Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia v. Bryden is a famous Canadian constitutional decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council where the exclusivity principle in Canadian federalism and pith and substance analysis was first articulated.Bryden was a shareholder in Union Colliery, a coal mining company in British Columbia, and was troubled by the company's practice of employing "Chinamen" and putting them into positions of authority.".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden label "Union Colliery Co. of British Columbia v. Bryden".
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden sameAs m.09_vxs.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden sameAs Q7885575.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden sameAs Q7885575.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden wasDerivedFrom Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden?oldid=558910715.
- Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden isPrimaryTopicOf Union_Colliery_Co._of_British_Columbia_v._Bryden.