Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Adams> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 37 of
37
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Adams abstract "United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39 (1966), is a United States Supreme Court decision in the area of patent law. This case was later cited in KSR v. Teleflex as an example of a case satisfying the requirement for non-obviousness of a combination of known elements. It also features one of the great stories of patent litigation lore, with Adams's attorney utilizing an innovative and unique method of non-oral advocacy at oral argument in front of the Supreme Court.".
- United_States_v._Adams wikiPageExternalLink about?id=86NWAAAAEBAJ&dq=2322210.
- United_States_v._Adams wikiPageID "23218225".
- United_States_v._Adams wikiPageRevisionID "587570460".
- United_States_v._Adams arguedate "--10-14".
- United_States_v._Adams argueyear "1965".
- United_States_v._Adams citation "172800.0".
- United_States_v._Adams decidedate "--02-21".
- United_States_v._Adams decideyear "1966".
- United_States_v._Adams dissent "White".
- United_States_v._Adams fullname "United States v. Bert N. Adams, et al.".
- United_States_v._Adams hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Adams.
- United_States_v._Adams holding "Wet battery including a combination of known elements not obvious because the operating characteristics were unexpected and improved over then-existing wet batteries.".
- United_States_v._Adams joinmajority "Warren, Harlan, Brennan, Black, Stewart, Douglas".
- United_States_v._Adams litigants "United States v. Adams".
- United_States_v._Adams majority "Clark".
- United_States_v._Adams notparticipating "Fortas".
- United_States_v._Adams scotus "1965".
- United_States_v._Adams uspage "39".
- United_States_v._Adams usvol "383".
- United_States_v._Adams subject Category:1966_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Adams subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Adams subject Category:United_States_patent_case_law.
- United_States_v._Adams type Case.
- United_States_v._Adams type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Adams type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Adams type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Adams type Event.
- United_States_v._Adams type Situation.
- United_States_v._Adams comment "United States v. Adams, 383 U.S. 39 (1966), is a United States Supreme Court decision in the area of patent law. This case was later cited in KSR v. Teleflex as an example of a case satisfying the requirement for non-obviousness of a combination of known elements. It also features one of the great stories of patent litigation lore, with Adams's attorney utilizing an innovative and unique method of non-oral advocacy at oral argument in front of the Supreme Court.".
- United_States_v._Adams label "United States v. Adams".
- United_States_v._Adams sameAs m.0660h_j.
- United_States_v._Adams sameAs Q7893209.
- United_States_v._Adams sameAs Q7893209.
- United_States_v._Adams wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Adams?oldid=587570460.
- United_States_v._Adams isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Adams.
- United_States_v._Adams name "United States v. Bert N. Adams, et al.".