Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Causby> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Causby abstract "United States v. Causby 328 U.S. 256 (1946) was an important United States Supreme Court that held that the ancient common law doctrine of ad coelum had no legal effect "in the modern world." In the case, Causby sued the United States for trespassing on his land, complaining specifically about how "low-flying military planes caused the plaintiffs' chickens to 'jump up against the side of the chicken house and the walls and burst themselves open and die' . . . The plaintiffs sued the government, arguing that they were entitled to compensation under the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment."".
- United_States_v._Causby wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=328&page=256.
- United_States_v._Causby wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- United_States_v._Causby wikiPageID "19378591".
- United_States_v._Causby wikiPageRevisionID "580677635".
- United_States_v._Causby arguedate "--05-01".
- United_States_v._Causby argueyear "1946".
- United_States_v._Causby case "United States v. Causby".
- United_States_v._Causby citation "328".
- United_States_v._Causby decidedate "--05-27".
- United_States_v._Causby decideyear "1946".
- United_States_v._Causby dissent "Black, Burton".
- United_States_v._Causby findlaw getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=328&page=256.
- United_States_v._Causby fullname "United States v. Causby".
- United_States_v._Causby hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Causby.
- United_States_v._Causby holding "Cujus est solum ejus est usque ad coelum et ad inferos has no legal authority in the United States when pertaining to the sky. A man does not have control and ownership over the airspace of their property except within reasonable limits to utilize their property. Airspace above a set minimum height is property of the Masses and no one man can accuse airplanes or other such craft within of trespassing on what they own.".
- United_States_v._Causby joinmajority "Reed, Frankfurter, Murphy, Rutledge".
- United_States_v._Causby justia case.html.
- United_States_v._Causby litigants "United States v. Causby".
- United_States_v._Causby majority "Douglas".
- United_States_v._Causby notparticipating "Jackson".
- United_States_v._Causby prior "104".
- United_States_v._Causby scotus "1945".
- United_States_v._Causby uspage "256".
- United_States_v._Causby usvol "328".
- United_States_v._Causby subject Category:1946_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Causby subject Category:Aviation_law.
- United_States_v._Causby subject Category:Takings_Clause_case_law.
- United_States_v._Causby subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Causby type Case.
- United_States_v._Causby type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Causby type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Causby type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Causby type Event.
- United_States_v._Causby type Situation.
- United_States_v._Causby comment "United States v. Causby 328 U.S. 256 (1946) was an important United States Supreme Court that held that the ancient common law doctrine of ad coelum had no legal effect "in the modern world." In the case, Causby sued the United States for trespassing on his land, complaining specifically about how "low-flying military planes caused the plaintiffs' chickens to 'jump up against the side of the chicken house and the walls and burst themselves open and die' . . .".
- United_States_v._Causby label "United States v. Causby".
- United_States_v._Causby sameAs m.04mxpbg.
- United_States_v._Causby sameAs Q7893242.
- United_States_v._Causby sameAs Q7893242.
- United_States_v._Causby wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Causby?oldid=580677635.
- United_States_v._Causby isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Causby.
- United_States_v._Causby name "United States v. Causby".