Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Constantine> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 36 of
36
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Constantine abstract "United States v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935) was a case before the United States Supreme Court that concerned liquor laws and taxation. Congress placed a tax on liquor dealers who violate state liquor laws. The Court struck down the relevant portion of the Revenue Act of 1926 as an attempt to punish a state violation through taxation.National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius referenced the logic in this decision to determine whether the Affordable Care Act was a penalty or tax in terms of the Constitution. The Court held that it was a tax by "[d]isregarding the designation of the exaction, and viewing its substance and application."".
- United_States_v._Constantine wikiPageID "3356140".
- United_States_v._Constantine wikiPageRevisionID "552512680".
- United_States_v._Constantine arguedate "--11-14".
- United_States_v._Constantine argueyear "1935".
- United_States_v._Constantine citation "56".
- United_States_v._Constantine decidedate "--12-09".
- United_States_v._Constantine decideyear "1935".
- United_States_v._Constantine dissent "Cardozo".
- United_States_v._Constantine fullname "United States v. Constantine".
- United_States_v._Constantine hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Constantine.
- United_States_v._Constantine joinmajority "Hughes, Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Stone".
- United_States_v._Constantine lawsapplied "Revenue Act of 1926".
- United_States_v._Constantine litigants "United States v. Constantine".
- United_States_v._Constantine majority "Roberts".
- United_States_v._Constantine prior "Cert. to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit".
- United_States_v._Constantine scotus "1932".
- United_States_v._Constantine uspage "287".
- United_States_v._Constantine usvol "296".
- United_States_v._Constantine subject Category:1935_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Constantine subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- United_States_v._Constantine subject Category:United_States_taxation_and_revenue_case_law.
- United_States_v._Constantine type Case.
- United_States_v._Constantine type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Constantine type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Constantine type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Constantine type Event.
- United_States_v._Constantine type Situation.
- United_States_v._Constantine comment "United States v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935) was a case before the United States Supreme Court that concerned liquor laws and taxation. Congress placed a tax on liquor dealers who violate state liquor laws. The Court struck down the relevant portion of the Revenue Act of 1926 as an attempt to punish a state violation through taxation.National Federation of Independent Business v.".
- United_States_v._Constantine label "United States v. Constantine".
- United_States_v._Constantine sameAs m.097fyf.
- United_States_v._Constantine sameAs Q7893251.
- United_States_v._Constantine sameAs Q7893251.
- United_States_v._Constantine wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Constantine?oldid=552512680.
- United_States_v._Constantine isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Constantine.
- United_States_v._Constantine name "United States v. Constantine".