Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Utah_v._Evans> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- Utah_v._Evans abstract "Utah v. Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (2002), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of certain statistical techniques in the census. In instances where the Census Bureau remained unsure of the number of residents at an address after a field visit, the Bureau inferred its population characteristics from its nearest similar neighbor, a practice called "hot-deck imputation." In the 2000 census, hot-deck imputation resulted in Utah receiving one less Representative in Congress than it would have without the practice. Utah sought an injunction requiring the Bureau to revise the census results without the use of imputation. North Carolina, which stood to lose a Representative under such an injunction, intervened in the case, disputing Utah's standing to sue. The Utah federal district court refused to grant the injunction.Utah argued that the Bureau's use of imputation violated 13 U.S.C. §195, which prohibits use of 'sampling' for apportioning Representatives among states. It further argued that imputation did not satisfy the United States Constitution's requirement of an "actual enumeration" for the purpose of apportioning Representatives. The Supreme Court rejected Utah's arguments and affirmed the district court's opinion.".
- Utah_v._Evans wikiPageID "3650150".
- Utah_v._Evans wikiPageRevisionID "564171819".
- Utah_v._Evans arguedate "--03-27".
- Utah_v._Evans argueyear "2002".
- Utah_v._Evans citation "172800.0".
- Utah_v._Evans dissent "O'Connor".
- Utah_v._Evans dissent "Thomas".
- Utah_v._Evans decidedate "--06-20".
- Utah_v._Evans decideyear "2002".
- Utah_v._Evans dissent "Scalia".
- Utah_v._Evans fullname "Utah, et al. v. Evans, Secretary of Commerce, et al.".
- Utah_v._Evans hasPhotoCollection Utah_v._Evans.
- Utah_v._Evans holding "Utah had standing to sue for a revision of the census results. The Bureau's use of hot-deck imputation did not violate 13 USC sec. 195, nor the census clause of the Constitution.".
- Utah_v._Evans dissent "Kennedy".
- Utah_v._Evans joinmajority "Rehnquist, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, O'Connor".
- Utah_v._Evans lawsapplied ", U.S. Const., Art. I, section 2, clause 3".
- Utah_v._Evans litigants "Utah v. Evans".
- Utah_v._Evans majority "Breyer".
- Utah_v._Evans prior "Utah sought an injunction compelling respondents to change the official census results. North Carolina intervened. The District Court for the District of Utah found for the Census Bureau".
- Utah_v._Evans scotus "1994".
- Utah_v._Evans uspage "452".
- Utah_v._Evans usvol "536".
- Utah_v._Evans subject Category:2002_in_case_law.
- Utah_v._Evans subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Utah_v._Evans subject Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Utah_v._Evans type Case.
- Utah_v._Evans type LegalCase.
- Utah_v._Evans type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Utah_v._Evans type UnitOfWork.
- Utah_v._Evans type Event.
- Utah_v._Evans type Situation.
- Utah_v._Evans comment "Utah v. Evans, 536 U.S. 452 (2002), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the use of certain statistical techniques in the census.".
- Utah_v._Evans label "Utah v. Evans".
- Utah_v._Evans sameAs m.09s89g.
- Utah_v._Evans sameAs Q7902543.
- Utah_v._Evans sameAs Q7902543.
- Utah_v._Evans wasDerivedFrom Utah_v._Evans?oldid=564171819.
- Utah_v._Evans isPrimaryTopicOf Utah_v._Evans.
- Utah_v._Evans name "Utah, et al. v. Evans, Secretary of Commerce, et al.".