Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP abstract "Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, often shortened to Verizon v. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004), is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of Antitrust law. It held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had not modified the framework of the Sherman Act, preserving claims that satisfy established antitrust standards without creating new claims that go beyond those standards. More importantly, it refused to extend the essential facilities doctrine beyond the facts of the controversial Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. case.".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP wikiPageExternalLink 2003_02_682.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP wikiPageID "12470324".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP wikiPageRevisionID "580038877".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP arguedate "--10-14".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP argueyear "2003".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP concurrence "Stevens".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP decidedate "--01-13".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP decideyear "2004".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP fullname "Verizon Communications, Petitioner v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP hasPhotoCollection Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP holding "Respondent's complaint alleging breach of an incumbent LEC's 1996 Act duty to share its network with competitors does not state a claim under §2 of the Sherman Act.".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP joinconcurrence "Souter, Thomas".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP joinmajority "Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP litigants "Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP majority "Scalia".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP scotus "1994".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP uspage "398".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP usvol "540".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP subject Category:2004_in_United_States_case_law.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP subject Category:United_States_antitrust_case_law.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP subject Category:United_States_communications_regulation_case_law.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP subject Category:Verizon_Communications.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP type Case.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP type LegalCase.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP type UnitOfWork.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP type Event.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP type Situation.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP comment "Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP, often shortened to Verizon v. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398 (2004), is a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in the field of Antitrust law. It held that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 had not modified the framework of the Sherman Act, preserving claims that satisfy established antitrust standards without creating new claims that go beyond those standards.".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP label "Verizon Communications v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP".
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP sameAs m.02w7ls9.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP sameAs Q7921429.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP sameAs Q7921429.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP wasDerivedFrom Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP?oldid=580038877.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP isPrimaryTopicOf Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP.
- Verizon_Communications_v._Law_Offices_of_Curtis_V._Trinko,_LLP name "Verizon Communications, Petitioner v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP".