Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Virginia_v._Black> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- Virginia_v._Black abstract "Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003), was a First Amendment case decided in the Supreme Court of the United States. Three defendants were convicted in two separate cases of violating a Virginia statute against cross burning. In this case, the Court struck down that statute to the extent that it considered cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate. Such a provision, the Court argued, blurs the distinction between proscribable "threats of intimidation" and the Ku Klux Klan's protected "messages of shared ideology." However, cross-burning can be a criminal offense if the intent to intimidate is proven.".
- Virginia_v._Black wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=01-1107.
- Virginia_v._Black wikiPageExternalLink 2002_01_1107.
- Virginia_v._Black wikiPageExternalLink argument.
- Virginia_v._Black wikiPageID "2482881".
- Virginia_v._Black wikiPageRevisionID "580923862".
- Virginia_v._Black arguedate "--12-11".
- Virginia_v._Black argueyear "2002".
- Virginia_v._Black concurrence "O'Connor".
- Virginia_v._Black concurrence "Stevens".
- Virginia_v._Black dissent "Scalia".
- Virginia_v._Black dissent "Souter".
- Virginia_v._Black decidedate "--04-07".
- Virginia_v._Black decideyear "2003".
- Virginia_v._Black dissent "Thomas".
- Virginia_v._Black fullname "Virginia v. Barry Elton Black, Richard J. Elliott, and Jonathan Oímara".
- Virginia_v._Black hasPhotoCollection Virginia_v._Black.
- Virginia_v._Black holding "Virginia's statute against cross burning is unconstitutional because it places the burden of proof on the defendant to demonstrate that he or she did not intend the cross burning as intimidation.".
- Virginia_v._Black joinconcurrence "Rehnquist, Stevens, Breyer".
- Virginia_v._Black dissent "Kennedy, Ginsburg".
- Virginia_v._Black dissent "Thomas".
- Virginia_v._Black joinmajority "Rehnquist, Stevens, Scalia, Breyer".
- Virginia_v._Black lawsapplied First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Virginia_v._Black litigants "Virginia v. Black".
- Virginia_v._Black majority "O'Connor".
- Virginia_v._Black oralargument argument.
- Virginia_v._Black parallelcitations "172800.0".
- Virginia_v._Black prior "17280.0".
- Virginia_v._Black scotus "1994".
- Virginia_v._Black subsequent "17280.0".
- Virginia_v._Black uspage "343".
- Virginia_v._Black usvol "538".
- Virginia_v._Black subject Category:2003_in_United_States_case_law.
- Virginia_v._Black subject Category:2003_in_the_United_States.
- Virginia_v._Black subject Category:Hate_crime.
- Virginia_v._Black subject Category:Legal_history_of_Virginia.
- Virginia_v._Black subject Category:United_States_Free_Speech_Clause_case_law.
- Virginia_v._Black subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Virginia_v._Black type Case.
- Virginia_v._Black type LegalCase.
- Virginia_v._Black type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Virginia_v._Black type UnitOfWork.
- Virginia_v._Black type Event.
- Virginia_v._Black type Situation.
- Virginia_v._Black comment "Virginia v. Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003), was a First Amendment case decided in the Supreme Court of the United States. Three defendants were convicted in two separate cases of violating a Virginia statute against cross burning. In this case, the Court struck down that statute to the extent that it considered cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate.".
- Virginia_v._Black label "Virginia v. Black".
- Virginia_v._Black sameAs m.07h23x.
- Virginia_v._Black sameAs Q7934714.
- Virginia_v._Black sameAs Q7934714.
- Virginia_v._Black wasDerivedFrom Virginia_v._Black?oldid=580923862.
- Virginia_v._Black isPrimaryTopicOf Virginia_v._Black.
- Virginia_v._Black name "Virginia v. Barry Elton Black, Richard J. Elliott, and Jonathan Oímara".