Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Wal-Mart_v._Dukes> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 45 of
45
with 100 items per page.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes abstract "Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case. The case was an appeal from the Ninth Circuit's decision in Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in which that court, eventually by a narrow 5-4 decision, reversed the district court's decision to certify a class action lawsuit in which the plaintiff class included 1.6 million women who currently work or have worked for Wal-Mart stores, including lead plaintiff Betty Dukes. Dukes, a current Wal-Mart employee, and others have alleged gender discrimination in pay and promotion policies and practices in Wal-Mart stores.The Court agreed to hear argument on whether a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 23(b)(2) that provides for class-actions where the defendant's actions make injunctive relief appropriate can also be used to file a class-action that demands monetary damages. The Court also asked the parties to argue whether the class meets the traditional requirements of numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation.The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the class should not be certified in its current form, although they disagreed 5-4 on the reason and on allowing it to continue in a different form.".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes wikiPageExternalLink 04-16688.pdf.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes wikiPageExternalLink justices-take-wal-mart-sex-bias-lawsuit-dec-6-2010.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes wikiPageExternalLink wal-mart-v-dukes.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes wikiPageExternalLink 10-277.pdf.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes wikiPageID "30271979".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes wikiPageRevisionID "602317754".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes arguedate "--03-29".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes argueyear "2011".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes dissent "Ginsburg".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes decidedate "--06-20".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes decideyear "2011".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes docket "10".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes fullname "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Petitioner v. Betty Dukes, et al.".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes hasPhotoCollection Wal-Mart_v._Dukes.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes holding "No right for class action.".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes dissent "Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes joinmajority "Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito; Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes litigants "Wal-Mart v. Dukes".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes majority "Scalia".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes parallelcitations "131".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes prior "25920.0".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes scotus "2010".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes uspage "___".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes usvol "564".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes subject Category:2011_in_United_States_case_law.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes subject Category:Class_action_lawsuits.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes subject Category:United_States_class_action_case_law.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes subject Category:Walmart.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes type Case.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes type LegalCase.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes type UnitOfWork.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes type Situation.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes comment "Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case. The case was an appeal from the Ninth Circuit's decision in Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., in which that court, eventually by a narrow 5-4 decision, reversed the district court's decision to certify a class action lawsuit in which the plaintiff class included 1.6 million women who currently work or have worked for Wal-Mart stores, including lead plaintiff Betty Dukes.".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes label "Dukes versus Wal-Mart".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes label "Wal-Mart v. Dukes".
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes sameAs Dukes_versus_Wal-Mart.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes sameAs m.0g53qq0.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes sameAs Q7961235.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes sameAs Q7961235.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes wasDerivedFrom Wal-Mart_v._Dukes?oldid=602317754.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes isPrimaryTopicOf Wal-Mart_v._Dukes.
- Wal-Mart_v._Dukes name "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Petitioner v. Betty Dukes, et al.".