Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Washington_v._Texas> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 items per page.
- Washington_v._Texas abstract "Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 (1967), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided that the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution (guaranteeing the right of a criminal defendant to force the attendance of witnesses for their side) is applicable in state courts as well as federal courts. Jackie Washington had attempted to call his co-defendant as a witness, but was blocked by Texas courts because state law prevented co-defendants from testifying for each other, under the theory that they would be likely to lie for each other on the stand.The Supreme Court reasoned that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment made the right to be able to compel defense witnesses to testify necessary for a defendant's "due process" rights to fair proceedings, which applies to the states. Only Justice John Marshall Harlan II parted from the Court's "due process" focus, though he agreed with the outcome, as he regularly did in cases involving whether to apply federal rights to state courts.The impact of Washington was narrowed by a later case, Taylor v. Illinois (1988), in which the Court said that "countervailing public interests", like the need to move through cases quickly, could be balanced against a defendant's right to present witnesses. In Taylor, the Supreme Court upheld a judge's order blocking defense witnesses from testifying due to the defense attorney's deliberate failure to disclose evidence to prosecutors earlier in the trial. The defense attorney's actions resulted in a lengthy delay in the proceedings which the trial judge felt was unjustified. Legal scholars have seen this new grant of discretion to trial judges as a change to relying on "efficient justice", a more limited vision of trial rights than the "right to present a defense" created in Washington.".
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageExternalLink viewcontent.cgi?article=1388&context=plr.
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageExternalLink viewcontent.cgi?article=2184&context=flr.
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageExternalLink 14.html.
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageExternalLink Kime%20Note.pdf.
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageExternalLink 1966_649.
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageExternalLink viewcontent.cgi?article=1699&context=ilj.
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageID "34780511".
- Washington_v._Texas wikiPageRevisionID "559371337".
- Washington_v._Texas arguedatea "--03-15".
- Washington_v._Texas arguedateb "16".
- Washington_v._Texas argueyear "1967".
- Washington_v._Texas case "Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14".
- Washington_v._Texas citation "172800.0".
- Washington_v._Texas colwidth "30".
- Washington_v._Texas concurrence "Harlan".
- Washington_v._Texas decidedate "--06-12".
- Washington_v._Texas decideyear "1967".
- Washington_v._Texas findlaw 14.html.
- Washington_v._Texas fullname "Jackie Washington v. Texas".
- Washington_v._Texas hasPhotoCollection Washington_v._Texas.
- Washington_v._Texas holding "The Compulsory Process Clause is incorporated against the states. Under that Clause, the Texas law at issue unconstitutionally bars defendants from obtaining witnesses in their favor because it blocks a "relevant and material" witness from testifying for the defense.".
- Washington_v._Texas joinmajority "Black, Douglas, Clark, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas".
- Washington_v._Texas justia case.html.
- Washington_v._Texas lawsapplied Compulsory_Process_Clause.
- Washington_v._Texas litigants "Washington v. Texas".
- Washington_v._Texas majority "Warren".
- Washington_v._Texas prior "172800.0".
- Washington_v._Texas scotus "1965".
- Washington_v._Texas subsequent "172800.0".
- Washington_v._Texas uspage "14".
- Washington_v._Texas usvol "388".
- Washington_v._Texas subject Category:1967_in_Texas.
- Washington_v._Texas subject Category:1967_in_United_States_case_law.
- Washington_v._Texas subject Category:Compulsory_Process_Clause_case_law.
- Washington_v._Texas subject Category:Incorporation_case_law.
- Washington_v._Texas subject Category:Legal_history_of_Texas.
- Washington_v._Texas subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Washington_v._Texas type Case.
- Washington_v._Texas type LegalCase.
- Washington_v._Texas type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Washington_v._Texas type UnitOfWork.
- Washington_v._Texas type Situation.
- Washington_v._Texas comment "Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 (1967), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided that the Compulsory Process Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution (guaranteeing the right of a criminal defendant to force the attendance of witnesses for their side) is applicable in state courts as well as federal courts.".
- Washington_v._Texas label "Washington v. Texas".
- Washington_v._Texas label "华盛顿诉德克萨斯州案".
- Washington_v._Texas sameAs m.0j3gvzq.
- Washington_v._Texas sameAs Q7972591.
- Washington_v._Texas sameAs Q7972591.
- Washington_v._Texas wasDerivedFrom Washington_v._Texas?oldid=559371337.
- Washington_v._Texas isPrimaryTopicOf Washington_v._Texas.
- Washington_v._Texas name "Jackie Washington v. Texas".