Matches in ESWC 2020 for { <https://metadata.2020.eswc-conferences.org/rdf/submissions/Paper.196_Review.0> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 10 of
10
with 100 items per page.
- Paper.196_Review.0 type ReviewVersion.
- Paper.196_Review.0 issued "2001-01-15T00:01:00.000Z".
- Paper.196_Review.0 creator Paper.196_Review.0_Reviewer.
- Paper.196_Review.0 hasRating ReviewRating.0.
- Paper.196_Review.0 hasReviewerConfidence ReviewerConfidence.3.
- Paper.196_Review.0 reviews Paper.196.
- Paper.196_Review.0 issuedAt easychair.org.
- Paper.196_Review.0 issuedFor Conference.
- Paper.196_Review.0 releasedBy Conference.
- Paper.196_Review.0 hasContent "- The problem statement is not quite clear, and even less precise - The problem statement should come with an expected theoretical guarantee of closeness between the sample and the entire data set - It should also include those guarantees for specific tasks related to RDF data profiles, e.g. QA, semantics, ... - The presentation should also be broader in the sense of providing some light on how profiles are represented (all kinds of things are included there as stated at the bottom of page 2), and how they are used in combination with RDF graphs for some tasks, e.g. QA - The goal of capturing semantics through the sample is only superficially stated and treated - The introduction states as specific objective to avoid misestimations (page 2, middle), but not much is said about how and to what (precise) extent - There certain contribution here; some people may find it useful, there are experiments, but the treatment is superficial"".