Matches in ESWC 2020 for { <https://metadata.2020.eswc-conferences.org/rdf/submissions/Paper.72_Review.1> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 10 of
10
with 100 items per page.
- Paper.72_Review.1 type ReviewVersion.
- Paper.72_Review.1 issued "2001-01-18T11:36:00.000Z".
- Paper.72_Review.1 creator Paper.72_Review.1_Reviewer.
- Paper.72_Review.1 hasRating ReviewRating.2.
- Paper.72_Review.1 hasReviewerConfidence ReviewerConfidence.4.
- Paper.72_Review.1 reviews Paper.72.
- Paper.72_Review.1 issuedAt easychair.org.
- Paper.72_Review.1 issuedFor Conference.
- Paper.72_Review.1 releasedBy Conference.
- Paper.72_Review.1 hasContent "The paper presents an interesting Entity Summarization BenchMark (ESBM). 1) The ESBM is said to overcome the limitations, however, these limitations of existing approaches are not covered (only references) sufficient detail. 2) Similarly, the desired criteria are not presented clearly in the paper. Hence the paper is not self-contained. - I suggest adding an overview of both. In the results section, the mean of F1 with the ground truth results does not seem the best estimate. In case there is an exact match with one summary, It can be concluded that the summarise works good, irrespective of how well/bad is the match with other summaries. Average F1 would be a good estimate for Oracle which is an intersection of the ground truths. For the results, it would be interesting to see the best F1, median, and also the worst-case match with the ground truths for one or two of the best approaches."".