Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/000814030/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 38 of
38
with 100 items per page.
- catalog alternative "De Coena Domini".
- catalog alternative "De Coena Domini. English".
- catalog contributor b1069517.
- catalog contributor b1069518.
- catalog created "c1979.".
- catalog date "1979".
- catalog date "c1979.".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "c1979.".
- catalog description "6. Negatively, the absence of Christ's body in the supper cannot be demonstrated clearly in the writings of the ancients -- F. The arguments of the adversaries from the similarity to the other sacraments -- G. Various and strange arguments of the adversaries.".
- catalog description "A. Paul's statement: "Whoever eats unworthily will be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord" -- B. Paul's statement: " not discerning the Lord's body" -- C. Paul's statement " The bread is the communion of the Lord's body" -- X. Arguments from the witness of antiquity -- A. The Eucharist consists of two things, the bread and the body of Christ, etc. -- B. The simile of the two natures in the person of Christ -- C. The substance of Christ's body is present wherever the Lord's supper is celebrated on earth -- D. The body of Christ is in heaven and at the same tine present in the Lord's supper -- E. The body of Christ in the Lord's supper is not only received in the heart or the spirit but also in a person's physical mouth, orally -- F. Christ joins himself to us not only in spirit but also with his body -- G. The resurrection and salvation of the flesh are demonstrated by our participation in the Lord's supper -- ".
- catalog description "C. The analogy of interpretation of the passages in which dogmas have their proper foundation -- D. The doctrine of the Lord's supper is taught primarily in the words of institution -- E. Doctrine cannot be established solely on the basis of figurative passages -- F. The norm of judgment in matters of doctrine cannot be ambiguous or open to doubt but must be sure and certain -- G. The institution of the supper was set forth by Christ in the form of his last will and testament -- H. It is impossible to derive one sure and certain meaning from the words of the supper if one departs from the proper meaning of the words -- I. Mysteries are to be judged only from the revealed word -- VIII. Arguments from the comparison of scripture passages in which the doctrine of the Lord's supper is treated and repeated -- A. The description of the institution according to Matthew -- B. The description of the institution according to Mark -- C. The description of the institution according to Luke -- ".
- catalog description "D. The description of the institution according to Paul -- IX. Arguments from other scripture passages".
- catalog description "H. The unworthy partake of the body of Christ but not to their salvation -- XI. The value of the doctrine of the substantial presence, distribution, and reception of the body and blood of the Lord in the supper -- XII. Concerning the arguments of the adversaries -- A. The arguments of the adversaries from the physical properties of the human body -- B. The arguments from the article of Christ's ascension and session at the right hand of God -- C. The arguments from passages dealing with the departure of Christ from this world -- D. The arguments from the doctrine of the spiritual eating and from John 6 -- E. The arguments of the adversaries from statements of the ancients -- 1. In what way the bread is called a sign of the body of Christ -- 2. In what way the Lord's supper is a sacramental eating -- 4. What Augustine calls the essence (res) of the sacrament -- 5. how ancients spoke in regard to the bodily and local absence of Christ -- ".
- catalog description "I. The words of the Lord's supper are not to be treated in a light or frivolous way but in the fear of the Lord -- II. The doctrine of the Lord's supper has its foundation in the words of institution -- III. How the true question at issue in the Sacrementarian controversy is to be established -- IV. What kind of descriptive terminology it is when it is asserted that the bread of the Lord's supper is the body of Christ -- V. Concerning the physical eating of the bread and concerning the twofold eating of the body of Christ, the sacramental and the spiritual -- VI. How the principal arguments can be gathered and arranged -- VII. Arguments from the clear and continuous analogy of the interpretation of scripture -- A. In which passages we may permit figures of speech and in which not -- B. How human reason attempts through figures of speech to evade the things which are spoken in the proper sense -- ".
- catalog description "Includes bibliographical references and indexes.".
- catalog extent "302 p. ;".
- catalog hasFormat "Lord's Supper.".
- catalog identifier "057003275X :".
- catalog isFormatOf "Lord's Supper.".
- catalog issued "1979".
- catalog issued "c1979.".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog language "englat".
- catalog publisher "St. Louis : Concordia Pub. House,".
- catalog relation "Lord's Supper.".
- catalog subject "BV824 .C4313".
- catalog subject "Lord's Supper Early works to 1800.".
- catalog tableOfContents "6. Negatively, the absence of Christ's body in the supper cannot be demonstrated clearly in the writings of the ancients -- F. The arguments of the adversaries from the similarity to the other sacraments -- G. Various and strange arguments of the adversaries.".
- catalog tableOfContents "A. Paul's statement: "Whoever eats unworthily will be guilty of the body and the blood of the Lord" -- B. Paul's statement: " not discerning the Lord's body" -- C. Paul's statement " The bread is the communion of the Lord's body" -- X. Arguments from the witness of antiquity -- A. The Eucharist consists of two things, the bread and the body of Christ, etc. -- B. The simile of the two natures in the person of Christ -- C. The substance of Christ's body is present wherever the Lord's supper is celebrated on earth -- D. The body of Christ is in heaven and at the same tine present in the Lord's supper -- E. The body of Christ in the Lord's supper is not only received in the heart or the spirit but also in a person's physical mouth, orally -- F. Christ joins himself to us not only in spirit but also with his body -- G. The resurrection and salvation of the flesh are demonstrated by our participation in the Lord's supper -- ".
- catalog tableOfContents "C. The analogy of interpretation of the passages in which dogmas have their proper foundation -- D. The doctrine of the Lord's supper is taught primarily in the words of institution -- E. Doctrine cannot be established solely on the basis of figurative passages -- F. The norm of judgment in matters of doctrine cannot be ambiguous or open to doubt but must be sure and certain -- G. The institution of the supper was set forth by Christ in the form of his last will and testament -- H. It is impossible to derive one sure and certain meaning from the words of the supper if one departs from the proper meaning of the words -- I. Mysteries are to be judged only from the revealed word -- VIII. Arguments from the comparison of scripture passages in which the doctrine of the Lord's supper is treated and repeated -- A. The description of the institution according to Matthew -- B. The description of the institution according to Mark -- C. The description of the institution according to Luke -- ".
- catalog tableOfContents "D. The description of the institution according to Paul -- IX. Arguments from other scripture passages".
- catalog tableOfContents "H. The unworthy partake of the body of Christ but not to their salvation -- XI. The value of the doctrine of the substantial presence, distribution, and reception of the body and blood of the Lord in the supper -- XII. Concerning the arguments of the adversaries -- A. The arguments of the adversaries from the physical properties of the human body -- B. The arguments from the article of Christ's ascension and session at the right hand of God -- C. The arguments from passages dealing with the departure of Christ from this world -- D. The arguments from the doctrine of the spiritual eating and from John 6 -- E. The arguments of the adversaries from statements of the ancients -- 1. In what way the bread is called a sign of the body of Christ -- 2. In what way the Lord's supper is a sacramental eating -- 4. What Augustine calls the essence (res) of the sacrament -- 5. how ancients spoke in regard to the bodily and local absence of Christ -- ".
- catalog tableOfContents "I. The words of the Lord's supper are not to be treated in a light or frivolous way but in the fear of the Lord -- II. The doctrine of the Lord's supper has its foundation in the words of institution -- III. How the true question at issue in the Sacrementarian controversy is to be established -- IV. What kind of descriptive terminology it is when it is asserted that the bread of the Lord's supper is the body of Christ -- V. Concerning the physical eating of the bread and concerning the twofold eating of the body of Christ, the sacramental and the spiritual -- VI. How the principal arguments can be gathered and arranged -- VII. Arguments from the clear and continuous analogy of the interpretation of scripture -- A. In which passages we may permit figures of speech and in which not -- B. How human reason attempts through figures of speech to evade the things which are spoken in the proper sense -- ".
- catalog title "De Coena Domini".
- catalog title "De Coena Domini. English".
- catalog title "The Lord's Supper = De Coena Domini / by Martin Chemnitz ; translated by J. A. O. Preus.".
- catalog type "Early works. fast".
- catalog type "text".