Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/001351949/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 24 of
24
with 100 items per page.
- catalog abstract "This report summarizes the results of study undertaken to develop criteria for evaluating and selecting tools used to build expert systems. The authors used an evaluation framework composed of five elements: (1) application characteristics, which describe the problem and the project to be undertaken; (2) tool capabilities, the capabilities that the tools support; (3) metrics, the quantitative and qualitative measures of merit for expert system tools; (4) assessment techniques, specific ways of applying metrics to tools; and (5) contexts, which describe the ways in which the evaluation criteria depend on the development phases targeted by a project. Many of the study's conclusions relate to software engineering aspects of the expert system endeavor. Robustness, reliability, portability, integrability, database access, concurrent access, performance, and user interface all appear to be increasingly important requirements for tools, as well as eventual requirements for the expert systems that will be produced with those tools. In addition, the expert system paradigm seems to have had a significant and beneficial effect on software engineering itself.".
- catalog contributor b1910218.
- catalog contributor b1910219.
- catalog contributor b1910220.
- catalog created "[1987]".
- catalog date "1987".
- catalog date "[1987]".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "[1987]".
- catalog description "Bibliography: p. 53-55.".
- catalog description "This report summarizes the results of study undertaken to develop criteria for evaluating and selecting tools used to build expert systems. The authors used an evaluation framework composed of five elements: (1) application characteristics, which describe the problem and the project to be undertaken; (2) tool capabilities, the capabilities that the tools support; (3) metrics, the quantitative and qualitative measures of merit for expert system tools; (4) assessment techniques, specific ways of applying metrics to tools; and (5) contexts, which describe the ways in which the evaluation criteria depend on the development phases targeted by a project. Many of the study's conclusions relate to software engineering aspects of the expert system endeavor. Robustness, reliability, portability, integrability, database access, concurrent access, performance, and user interface all appear to be increasingly important requirements for tools, as well as eventual requirements for the expert systems that will be produced with those tools. In addition, the expert system paradigm seems to have had a significant and beneficial effect on software engineering itself.".
- catalog extent "xi, 55 p. :".
- catalog hasFormat "Evaluating expert system tools.".
- catalog identifier "0833008668".
- catalog isFormatOf "Evaluating expert system tools.".
- catalog issued "1987".
- catalog issued "[1987]".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog publisher "Santa Monica, CA : Rand,".
- catalog relation "Evaluating expert system tools.".
- catalog subject "006.3/3 19".
- catalog subject "Expert systems (Computer science)".
- catalog subject "QA76.76.E95 E93 1987".
- catalog title "Evaluating expert system tools : a framework and methodology / Jeff Rothenberg ... [et al.].".
- catalog type "text".