Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/002240047/catalog> ?p ?o. }

• catalog contributor b3223509.
• catalog created "[1889]".
• catalog date "1889".
• catalog date "[1889]".
• catalog dateCopyrighted "[1889]".
• catalog description "General considerations -- Christianity not the offspring either of man's natural consciousness or of the Bible -- Neither human opinion nor the Bible has authority over the Christian Church -- A normal Christian experience cannot conflict with a correct understanding of the Bible -- As between the Bible and Christian opinion the Bible is the regulative authority -- The Christian's religious insight has an important function, that of interpreting the Scriptures; distinguishing between the more and the less important; harmonizing the different parts of the Bible -- The general assumption of the infallibility of the Bible does not solve all questions of the controversy -- No theory of Biblical infallibility can be maintained which is contradicted by the Scriptures themselves".
• catalog description "How far does Old Testament prophecy authenticate the divinity of the Mosaic and Christian revelations? -- The argument as compared with that from miracles -- Apparent weakness of the argument -- Reasons why minute exactness in prophecy should not be expected -- The main work of the prophet was preaching, not prediction -- Criterion for the interpretations of predictions -- Minute particularity in prediction would cause doubts of the genuineness of the prophecy -- Minuteness of prediction would interfere with the free and natural course of things Prophetic language needed to be intelligible to the immediate hearers -- It was colored by the circumstances of the prophet's time -- The strength of the argument from prophecy is in the combination of them, and their convergence towards Christ -- How far does the New Testament authenticate the miracles recorded in the Old? -- No radical distinction between the miracles of the two Testaments -- But the possibility of the admission of apocryphal stories may be admitted -- In general the references to Old Testament miracles in the New implies that Christ and the others who refer to them regarded them as genuine".
• catalog description "How far does the New Testament authenticate the Old Testament history? -- In general Christ and the apostles treat this history as genuine -- The narratives in Gen. i.-iii considered -- Efforts to treat them as poetic or allegoric authentication of authorship -- Jewish traditions in the New Testament -- The Record of the Revelation-Inspiration -- The distinction between revelation and the record of it -- Revelation prior and superior to the record -- Revelation more important than the inspiration of the Biblical writers -- The fact of revelation not proved by prior assumption of Biblical inspiration -- Yet there is substantial ground for holding to the doctrine of the special inspiration of the Bible -- Preliminary remarks -- Not the Scriptures, but the Scriptural writers, can be inspired -- The Biblical writers were conscious and responsible in the act of writing -- The product of the inspiration was humans as well as divine -- The inspiration of the writers not superior to that of the recipients of the revelation -- The recipients of the revelation not more inspired when writing than speaking".
• catalog description "J.S. Mill's objection -- Reply -- Notion of an absolute religion -- Revelation no more universal and individual than the communication of knowledge in general -- Relation of sin to revelation -- Necessity of putting peculiar confidence in individuals, especially in Jesus Christ -- Objection to this -- Reply -- Men naturally crave leaders -- Revelation involves the assumption of a supernatural agency -- Miracles defined -- Overstatements -- Miracles not violations or transgressions of natural -- Hume's doctrine considered -- "Supernatural Religion" -- Professed theists' objections to miracles -- C.H. Weisse's -- Rothe's reply -- Ancient and present conception of natural processes; or as analogous to mesmeric effects; or as wrought with the co-operation of natural forces (Professor Ladd); or as the result of occult natural causes -- The distinction between absolute and relative miracles -- Different forms of it -- The distinction untenable -- Special providences -- Answers to prayer -- The Evidential Value of Miracles -- Miracles commonly regarded as attestations of the organs of revelation -- Reactionary view".
• catalog description "Origin of the theistic belief -- Character of existing skepticism -- Tendency to anti-supernaturalism and atheism -- The theistic problem -- Origin of theistic belief in the individual -- The belief comes form tradition -- Knowledge in general a social matter, as regards historical and scientific truths; the objects of direct perception; the training of the faculties; the advance in scientific acquisitions; the apprehension of intuitive truths; the adoption of theistic notions -- Yet individual cognition must precede the transmission of knowledge -- Testimony of other men cannot be accepted till first the existence of other men is assumed -- The material world must be cognized by the individual before there can be a general knowledge of its existence -- All that is truly known must be assumed to have been originally an object of direct perception -- Intuitive truths cannot be accepted merely on testimony".
• catalog description "Proof of the Christian Miracles -- Proof of Christ's resurrection -- The apostles believed that Christ rose from the dead on the third day after the crucifixion -- The Christian Church spread rapidly immediately after the crucifixion -- These phenomena satisfactorily explained only by the assumption that the resurrection was a fact -- Opposing theories -- That Jesus did not die, but only swooned, on the cross -- That the story of the resurrection was a fiction -- That the disciples mistakenly thought the resurrection to be real. The latter most plausible, but purely conjectural. Attempt to establish it by Paul's testimony -- Reply: Paul affirms the fact of a Christ with a vision -- What is vision? -- A vision may have an objective cause -- View of Schenkel, Keim, etc., considered. Paul's testimony as confirmed by that of the Gospels. The alleged discrepancies -- Apostolic testimony besides Paul's -- Proof of the miracles wrought by Christ -- The miraculous penetrates all the Gospel history, and cannot be removed -- Christ's extraordinary claims -- Specimen of the efforts to explain away the miracles -- The miracles of healing".
• catalog description "Revelation as confirmatory of theistic impulses -- Revelation useless without a theistic tendency -- Belief in a God involves a desire for a revelation -- Revelation, when it is received, a surer ground of knowledge than theistic arguments. Example of the ordinary Christian -- Theism cannot thrive without faith in a revelation -- The objection from the multiplicity of alleged revelations -- The question not how the first theistic notion arose -- Dr. A. M. Fairbairn's argument against the hypothesis of a primeval revelation -- Relation of language to revelation -- Essential uniqueness of the condition of primeval man -- Evolutionism does not remove the uniqueness -- The problem as it presents itself to theist -- How is the aboriginal conscience to be conceived -- Present analogies favor the theory of a supernatural revelation -- Dr. Fairbairn's notion of an "atheism of consciousness" -- Does God desire to be known -- Alleged impossibility of primeval revelation -- Pfleiderer's argument -- View of Theodore Parker and F.W. Newman. Misconceptions of what a revelation is expected to do -- Pfleiderer again -- Alleged gradualness of development of theistic ideas -- The Christian Revelation -- General Features -- Miracles Defined -- The argument for Christianity may relate to contents or to form -- Three points in the latter case -- Revelation limited to a particular time".
• catalog description "Tendency to question the use of miracles -- Is faith in miracles a matter of indifference? -- Various shades of view here included -- The objection to the common view stated -- The agnostic view conflicts with faith in Christianity as a special revelation -- Pfleiderer's conception of Jesus' inspiration considered -- Abuse of the contradiction as regards the uniqueness and authority of Jesus Christ -- No explanation of the uniqueness on naturalistic grounds -- Jesus' claim of authority not explained by his unique excellence -- Ritschl's view -- Herrmann's view considered -- The Ritschl doctrine of miracles -- Skeptical Christians, in attempting to ignore the miraculous, virtually admit the greater miracles while they deny the lesser -- In admitting the fact of a special revelation, or of the sinlessness of Christ, they admit the miraculous in the spiritual world -- The agnostic attitude towards miracles leads to caprice in the treatment of the New Testament records -- Matthew Arnold's attempt to show that Jesus claimed no miraculous power -- Denial of the supernatural leads to unfounded conjectures concerning the miraculous stories -- Mr. Arnold's theory of the origin of the stories of miracles".
• catalog description "The Bible is perfect in the sense that it is perfectly adapted to accomplish its end when used by one who is in sympathy with that end -- The conditions and limits of Biblical Criticism -- Biblical criticism is needful and useful -- But it has its limitations -- Freedom from prepossessions as a qualification for critical research is neither attainable nor desirable -- One's critical judgment respecting Christ and Christianity -- Neither critical research nor Christian insight will ever effect a reconstruction of the Biblical Canon -- Biblical criticism can never persuade the Christian Church that pious fraud has played on important part in determining the substance or form of the Scriptural Canon -- The Tubingen theory -- The Kuenen-Wellhausen theory -- Reasons why such views cannot be accepted".
• catalog description "The evidential value of miracles cannot be detached from the personal character and teachings of the miracle-worker -- But the miracles are nevertheless evidential -- Examination of the view that the miracles of Christ were mere effluxes of his nature, and not as such evidential -- On this view miracles are not needed as manifestations of Christ's character, and become not only not evidential, but embarrassing -- Miracles of the apostles -- Why are Christ's miracles credited? -- Their use in probing Christ's uniqueness and sinlessness -- The disciples' confidence in Jesus' faultlessness and divinity not fixed till after the resurrection -- According to the New Testament the miracles did serve an evidential purpose -- Professor Bruce's contention against Mozley -- Conclusion: Miracles have an indispensable evidential worth, but not independent of the evidence derived from the personal character and doctrine of the miracle-worker -- Advantages of this view -- Relation of this view to the importance of the experimental evidence -- Christian morality: its distinctive features -- The power of Christianity depends on the assumption of its supernaturalness".
• catalog description "Theism not a direct intuition -- The presumption is in favor of theism as over against atheism -- the argument for theism as seen in the light of the legitimate consequences of adopting atheism. On the atheistic hypothesis the universe is aimless and meaningless. Free will and moral character impossible. Truth and error equally authoritative. So Herbert Spencer's doctrine. Knowledge being held to be only relative, all so-called knowledge becomes merely a series of impressions. The fact of error and ignorance suggests the existence of an Intelligence which is without error or ignorance. The origin of intelligence. Relation of morality to atheistic conceptions. Atheism cannot explain the moral sense either as regards its origin, its present working, or its ultimate end. Logical issue of atheism is utter indifference to the general welfare. Futility of the notion of moral order on atheistic basis. All life a farce unless there is a God. And the farce must be infinitely repeated. The general result is that the mind of man demands that the universe shall have an end and a good end. The teleological and the moral arguments not the source of a belief in God, but rest on the belief. The belief springs from a tendency to assume a personal moral Power who directs the affairs of the universe. Agnostic objections futile".
• catalog description "Theism, if valid, must depend on something more than testimony -- Sure knowledge results from a combination of individual cognitions. Individual cognition is the prior things, but does not become free from the suspicion of illusion till confirmed by others -- Grounds of the theistic belief -- What is the ultimate ground of theism? It has a double foundation -- Theism springs from native impulses of the mind -- What leads to the persistent defense of theism presumably operative in producing it -- Hence the hypotheses which derive theism from dreams, fear, etc., groundless -- They overlook the fact requiring explanation, namely, the persistent tendency to believe in a God -- So the Ritschl theory that theism sprung from a sense of weakness and want".
• catalog description "Was the inspiration specifically different from that of believers in general -- Objections against the doctrine of such difference answered -- Arguments for the doctrine -- Antecedent probability that the authors of books which were to serve so important a purpose would be specially aided -- The general opinion of Christendom that the Scriptures were peculiarly inspired Testimony of the Bible itself -- Christ's authority ultimate -- The force of 2 Tim. iii -- Other representations kindred to this -- Rothe's attempt to distinguish between Christ's testimony and that of the apostles -- Some objections considered -- The authority of the Scriptures -- The search after Christian assurance -- Biblical testimony as a ground of certitude -- The two methods of arguing Biblical infallibility, the subjective and the objective".
• catalog description "Why they are more readily believed than others -- Untenableness of the notion that Christ healed by a sort of magnetic power naturally growing out of his superior spirituality -- May the New Testament miracles be critically examined? -- The character of the alleged miracle as a criterion of its reality -- Particular miracles that are offensive to some -- Need of caution in applying part and proof of the Christian religion -- Distinction between Jew and Gentile with regard to the evidence of Jesus' Messiahship -- The relation of Christianity to Judaism -- Was Christianity the fulfillment of all religious prophecies and hopes, or only of the Jewish? -- Burnouf's theory of the Aryan origin of Christianity -- Jesus himself was a Jew, and asserted his religion to be the completion of the Mosaic revelation -- Paul affirms the same -- The conclusion unavoidable -- Connected questions -- How far was Christ prophesied of by Moses and the prophets? -- Distinction between direct and indirect prophecies -- Marsh and Stuart on the typical theory -- Their view criticised".
• catalog extent "xv, 469 p. ;".
• catalog hasFormat "Supernatural revelation.".
• catalog isFormatOf "Supernatural revelation.".
• catalog isPartOf "(Lectures on the L. P. Stone Foundation, delivered at Princeton Theological Seminary)".
• catalog issued "1889".
• catalog issued "[1889]".
• catalog language "eng".
• catalog publisher "New York: A.D.F. Randolph and co.".
• catalog relation "Supernatural revelation.".
• catalog subject "Apologetics History 19th century.".
• catalog subject "Apologetics.".
• catalog subject "BT1101 .M44".
• catalog subject "Revelation Christianity.".
• catalog subject "Revelation.".
• catalog tableOfContents "General considerations -- Christianity not the offspring either of man's natural consciousness or of the Bible -- Neither human opinion nor the Bible has authority over the Christian Church -- A normal Christian experience cannot conflict with a correct understanding of the Bible -- As between the Bible and Christian opinion the Bible is the regulative authority -- The Christian's religious insight has an important function, that of interpreting the Scriptures; distinguishing between the more and the less important; harmonizing the different parts of the Bible -- The general assumption of the infallibility of the Bible does not solve all questions of the controversy -- No theory of Biblical infallibility can be maintained which is contradicted by the Scriptures themselves".
• catalog tableOfContents "How far does Old Testament prophecy authenticate the divinity of the Mosaic and Christian revelations? -- The argument as compared with that from miracles -- Apparent weakness of the argument -- Reasons why minute exactness in prophecy should not be expected -- The main work of the prophet was preaching, not prediction -- Criterion for the interpretations of predictions -- Minute particularity in prediction would cause doubts of the genuineness of the prophecy -- Minuteness of prediction would interfere with the free and natural course of things Prophetic language needed to be intelligible to the immediate hearers -- It was colored by the circumstances of the prophet's time -- The strength of the argument from prophecy is in the combination of them, and their convergence towards Christ -- How far does the New Testament authenticate the miracles recorded in the Old? -- No radical distinction between the miracles of the two Testaments -- But the possibility of the admission of apocryphal stories may be admitted -- In general the references to Old Testament miracles in the New implies that Christ and the others who refer to them regarded them as genuine".
• catalog tableOfContents "How far does the New Testament authenticate the Old Testament history? -- In general Christ and the apostles treat this history as genuine -- The narratives in Gen. i.-iii considered -- Efforts to treat them as poetic or allegoric authentication of authorship -- Jewish traditions in the New Testament -- The Record of the Revelation-Inspiration -- The distinction between revelation and the record of it -- Revelation prior and superior to the record -- Revelation more important than the inspiration of the Biblical writers -- The fact of revelation not proved by prior assumption of Biblical inspiration -- Yet there is substantial ground for holding to the doctrine of the special inspiration of the Bible -- Preliminary remarks -- Not the Scriptures, but the Scriptural writers, can be inspired -- The Biblical writers were conscious and responsible in the act of writing -- The product of the inspiration was humans as well as divine -- The inspiration of the writers not superior to that of the recipients of the revelation -- The recipients of the revelation not more inspired when writing than speaking".
• catalog tableOfContents "J.S. Mill's objection -- Reply -- Notion of an absolute religion -- Revelation no more universal and individual than the communication of knowledge in general -- Relation of sin to revelation -- Necessity of putting peculiar confidence in individuals, especially in Jesus Christ -- Objection to this -- Reply -- Men naturally crave leaders -- Revelation involves the assumption of a supernatural agency -- Miracles defined -- Overstatements -- Miracles not violations or transgressions of natural -- Hume's doctrine considered -- "Supernatural Religion" -- Professed theists' objections to miracles -- C.H. Weisse's -- Rothe's reply -- Ancient and present conception of natural processes; or as analogous to mesmeric effects; or as wrought with the co-operation of natural forces (Professor Ladd); or as the result of occult natural causes -- The distinction between absolute and relative miracles -- Different forms of it -- The distinction untenable -- Special providences -- Answers to prayer -- The Evidential Value of Miracles -- Miracles commonly regarded as attestations of the organs of revelation -- Reactionary view".
• catalog tableOfContents "Origin of the theistic belief -- Character of existing skepticism -- Tendency to anti-supernaturalism and atheism -- The theistic problem -- Origin of theistic belief in the individual -- The belief comes form tradition -- Knowledge in general a social matter, as regards historical and scientific truths; the objects of direct perception; the training of the faculties; the advance in scientific acquisitions; the apprehension of intuitive truths; the adoption of theistic notions -- Yet individual cognition must precede the transmission of knowledge -- Testimony of other men cannot be accepted till first the existence of other men is assumed -- The material world must be cognized by the individual before there can be a general knowledge of its existence -- All that is truly known must be assumed to have been originally an object of direct perception -- Intuitive truths cannot be accepted merely on testimony".
• catalog tableOfContents "Proof of the Christian Miracles -- Proof of Christ's resurrection -- The apostles believed that Christ rose from the dead on the third day after the crucifixion -- The Christian Church spread rapidly immediately after the crucifixion -- These phenomena satisfactorily explained only by the assumption that the resurrection was a fact -- Opposing theories -- That Jesus did not die, but only swooned, on the cross -- That the story of the resurrection was a fiction -- That the disciples mistakenly thought the resurrection to be real. The latter most plausible, but purely conjectural. Attempt to establish it by Paul's testimony -- Reply: Paul affirms the fact of a Christ with a vision -- What is vision? -- A vision may have an objective cause -- View of Schenkel, Keim, etc., considered. Paul's testimony as confirmed by that of the Gospels. The alleged discrepancies -- Apostolic testimony besides Paul's -- Proof of the miracles wrought by Christ -- The miraculous penetrates all the Gospel history, and cannot be removed -- Christ's extraordinary claims -- Specimen of the efforts to explain away the miracles -- The miracles of healing".
• catalog tableOfContents "Revelation as confirmatory of theistic impulses -- Revelation useless without a theistic tendency -- Belief in a God involves a desire for a revelation -- Revelation, when it is received, a surer ground of knowledge than theistic arguments. Example of the ordinary Christian -- Theism cannot thrive without faith in a revelation -- The objection from the multiplicity of alleged revelations -- The question not how the first theistic notion arose -- Dr. A. M. Fairbairn's argument against the hypothesis of a primeval revelation -- Relation of language to revelation -- Essential uniqueness of the condition of primeval man -- Evolutionism does not remove the uniqueness -- The problem as it presents itself to theist -- How is the aboriginal conscience to be conceived -- Present analogies favor the theory of a supernatural revelation -- Dr. Fairbairn's notion of an "atheism of consciousness" -- Does God desire to be known -- Alleged impossibility of primeval revelation -- Pfleiderer's argument -- View of Theodore Parker and F.W. Newman. Misconceptions of what a revelation is expected to do -- Pfleiderer again -- Alleged gradualness of development of theistic ideas -- The Christian Revelation -- General Features -- Miracles Defined -- The argument for Christianity may relate to contents or to form -- Three points in the latter case -- Revelation limited to a particular time".
• catalog tableOfContents "Tendency to question the use of miracles -- Is faith in miracles a matter of indifference? -- Various shades of view here included -- The objection to the common view stated -- The agnostic view conflicts with faith in Christianity as a special revelation -- Pfleiderer's conception of Jesus' inspiration considered -- Abuse of the contradiction as regards the uniqueness and authority of Jesus Christ -- No explanation of the uniqueness on naturalistic grounds -- Jesus' claim of authority not explained by his unique excellence -- Ritschl's view -- Herrmann's view considered -- The Ritschl doctrine of miracles -- Skeptical Christians, in attempting to ignore the miraculous, virtually admit the greater miracles while they deny the lesser -- In admitting the fact of a special revelation, or of the sinlessness of Christ, they admit the miraculous in the spiritual world -- The agnostic attitude towards miracles leads to caprice in the treatment of the New Testament records -- Matthew Arnold's attempt to show that Jesus claimed no miraculous power -- Denial of the supernatural leads to unfounded conjectures concerning the miraculous stories -- Mr. Arnold's theory of the origin of the stories of miracles".
• catalog tableOfContents "The Bible is perfect in the sense that it is perfectly adapted to accomplish its end when used by one who is in sympathy with that end -- The conditions and limits of Biblical Criticism -- Biblical criticism is needful and useful -- But it has its limitations -- Freedom from prepossessions as a qualification for critical research is neither attainable nor desirable -- One's critical judgment respecting Christ and Christianity -- Neither critical research nor Christian insight will ever effect a reconstruction of the Biblical Canon -- Biblical criticism can never persuade the Christian Church that pious fraud has played on important part in determining the substance or form of the Scriptural Canon -- The Tubingen theory -- The Kuenen-Wellhausen theory -- Reasons why such views cannot be accepted".
• catalog tableOfContents "The evidential value of miracles cannot be detached from the personal character and teachings of the miracle-worker -- But the miracles are nevertheless evidential -- Examination of the view that the miracles of Christ were mere effluxes of his nature, and not as such evidential -- On this view miracles are not needed as manifestations of Christ's character, and become not only not evidential, but embarrassing -- Miracles of the apostles -- Why are Christ's miracles credited? -- Their use in probing Christ's uniqueness and sinlessness -- The disciples' confidence in Jesus' faultlessness and divinity not fixed till after the resurrection -- According to the New Testament the miracles did serve an evidential purpose -- Professor Bruce's contention against Mozley -- Conclusion: Miracles have an indispensable evidential worth, but not independent of the evidence derived from the personal character and doctrine of the miracle-worker -- Advantages of this view -- Relation of this view to the importance of the experimental evidence -- Christian morality: its distinctive features -- The power of Christianity depends on the assumption of its supernaturalness".
• catalog tableOfContents "Theism not a direct intuition -- The presumption is in favor of theism as over against atheism -- the argument for theism as seen in the light of the legitimate consequences of adopting atheism. On the atheistic hypothesis the universe is aimless and meaningless. Free will and moral character impossible. Truth and error equally authoritative. So Herbert Spencer's doctrine. Knowledge being held to be only relative, all so-called knowledge becomes merely a series of impressions. The fact of error and ignorance suggests the existence of an Intelligence which is without error or ignorance. The origin of intelligence. Relation of morality to atheistic conceptions. Atheism cannot explain the moral sense either as regards its origin, its present working, or its ultimate end. Logical issue of atheism is utter indifference to the general welfare. Futility of the notion of moral order on atheistic basis. All life a farce unless there is a God. And the farce must be infinitely repeated. The general result is that the mind of man demands that the universe shall have an end and a good end. The teleological and the moral arguments not the source of a belief in God, but rest on the belief. The belief springs from a tendency to assume a personal moral Power who directs the affairs of the universe. Agnostic objections futile".
• catalog tableOfContents "Theism, if valid, must depend on something more than testimony -- Sure knowledge results from a combination of individual cognitions. Individual cognition is the prior things, but does not become free from the suspicion of illusion till confirmed by others -- Grounds of the theistic belief -- What is the ultimate ground of theism? It has a double foundation -- Theism springs from native impulses of the mind -- What leads to the persistent defense of theism presumably operative in producing it -- Hence the hypotheses which derive theism from dreams, fear, etc., groundless -- They overlook the fact requiring explanation, namely, the persistent tendency to believe in a God -- So the Ritschl theory that theism sprung from a sense of weakness and want".
• catalog tableOfContents "Was the inspiration specifically different from that of believers in general -- Objections against the doctrine of such difference answered -- Arguments for the doctrine -- Antecedent probability that the authors of books which were to serve so important a purpose would be specially aided -- The general opinion of Christendom that the Scriptures were peculiarly inspired Testimony of the Bible itself -- Christ's authority ultimate -- The force of 2 Tim. iii -- Other representations kindred to this -- Rothe's attempt to distinguish between Christ's testimony and that of the apostles -- Some objections considered -- The authority of the Scriptures -- The search after Christian assurance -- Biblical testimony as a ground of certitude -- The two methods of arguing Biblical infallibility, the subjective and the objective".
• catalog tableOfContents "Why they are more readily believed than others -- Untenableness of the notion that Christ healed by a sort of magnetic power naturally growing out of his superior spirituality -- May the New Testament miracles be critically examined? -- The character of the alleged miracle as a criterion of its reality -- Particular miracles that are offensive to some -- Need of caution in applying part and proof of the Christian religion -- Distinction between Jew and Gentile with regard to the evidence of Jesus' Messiahship -- The relation of Christianity to Judaism -- Was Christianity the fulfillment of all religious prophecies and hopes, or only of the Jewish? -- Burnouf's theory of the Aryan origin of Christianity -- Jesus himself was a Jew, and asserted his religion to be the completion of the Mosaic revelation -- Paul affirms the same -- The conclusion unavoidable -- Connected questions -- How far was Christ prophesied of by Moses and the prophets? -- Distinction between direct and indirect prophecies -- Marsh and Stuart on the typical theory -- Their view criticised".
• catalog title "Supernatural revelation : an essay concerning the basis of the Christian faith. By C. M. Mead.".
• catalog type "History. fast".
• catalog type "text".