Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/002296281/catalog> ?p ?o. }

• catalog abstract "The survey involved asking police chiefs, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and bail project directors in 80 cities a variety of questions concerning the processing of arrested persons prior to trial. The research objectives included: 1) developing a model designed to determine the optimum percentage of defendants to hold prior to trial, 2) developing a model designed to make decisions on whether a defendant should be released or held in jail prior to trial, 3) comparing cities having bail reform projects with cities not having them, 4) comparing cities that require arrested persons to provide 10 percent of the bond with cities requiring 100 percent of the bond, and 5) determining the causes and effects of variations across cities in the percentage of defendants held in jail prior to trial. The data were obtained by mailing questionnaires in 1969 to judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and bail project directors in 80 cities. Of the 280 questionnaires mailed 156 respondents or 56 percent sent back usable questionnaires. The questionnaire recipients were determined by consulting such directories as the A.B.A. Criminal Law Directory and the MartindaleHubbell Legal Directory.".
• catalog contributor b3299509.
• catalog contributor b3299510.
• catalog contributor b3299511.
• catalog contributor b3299512.
• catalog contributor b3299513.
• catalog created "[197-?]".
• catalog date "1970".
• catalog date "[197-?]".
• catalog dateCopyrighted "[197-?]".
• catalog description "156 respondents.".
• catalog description "Nagel, S., P. Wice, and M. Neff. Too Much or Too Little Policy: The Example of Pretrial Release (Sage Publications, 1977).".
• catalog description "Nagel, S., and M. Neff. "Legal Policy Optimizing Models," Journal of Legal Education (Spring 1977).".
• catalog description "Nagel, S., and M. Neff. Legal Policy Analysis: Finding an Optimum Level or Mix (Lexington-Heath, 1977).".
• catalog description "The survey involved asking police chiefs, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and bail project directors in 80 cities a variety of questions concerning the processing of arrested persons prior to trial. The research objectives included: 1) developing a model designed to determine the optimum percentage of defendants to hold prior to trial, 2) developing a model designed to make decisions on whether a defendant should be released or held in jail prior to trial, 3) comparing cities having bail reform projects with cities not having them, 4) comparing cities that require arrested persons to provide 10 percent of the bond with cities requiring 100 percent of the bond, and 5) determining the causes and effects of variations across cities in the percentage of defendants held in jail prior to trial. The data were obtained by mailing questionnaires in 1969 to judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and bail project directors in 80 cities. Of the 280 questionnaires mailed 156 respondents or 56 percent sent back usable questionnaires. The questionnaire recipients were determined by consulting such directories as the A.B.A. Criminal Law Directory and the MartindaleHubbell Legal Directory.".
• catalog description "United States.".
• catalog extent "data file ( logical records) +".
• catalog isPartOf "ICPSR (Series) ; 7538.".
• catalog isPartOf "ICPSR ; 7538".
• catalog issued "1970".
• catalog issued "[197-?]".
• catalog language "und".
• catalog publisher "Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor],".
• catalog spatial "United States".
• catalog spatial "United States.".
• catalog subject "Arrest United States Public opinion.".
• catalog subject "Criminal justice personnel United States Attitudes.".
• catalog subject "Pre-trial release United States Public opinion.".
• catalog subject "Public opinion United States.".
• catalog subject "XII. Legal Systems.".
• catalog title "Pretrial release data, 1969 [computer file] / principal investigators, Stuart S. Nagel, Paul Wice and Marian Neff.".