Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/002296850/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- catalog abstract "The data were obtained by mailing 600 questionnaires in 1970 to newspaper editors, police chiefs, prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys from a sample of 166 cities across the country. Questions were mainly asked concerning: 1) the degree of pretrial press publicity on pending criminal cases 2) relevant attitudes especially concerning ways of reducing the adverse effects of pretrial publicity while still having an informed public, and 30 prevailing procedures by editors, police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges. Fifty-four percent of the newspaper editors responded, 65 percent of the police chiefs, 50 percent of the prosecuting attorneys, and 48 percent of the defense attorneys, representing all fifty states.".
- catalog contributor b3301049.
- catalog contributor b3301050.
- catalog contributor b3301051.
- catalog contributor b3301052.
- catalog contributor b3301053.
- catalog created "[1977?]".
- catalog date "1977".
- catalog date "[1977?]".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "[1977?]".
- catalog description "Nagel, S., K. Reinbolt, and T. Eimermann. "A Linear Programming Approach to Problems of Conflicting Legal Values like Free Press versus Fair Trial," Rutgers Journal of Computers and the Law, 1975.".
- catalog description "Nagel, S., K. Reinbolt, and T. Eimermann. "Free Press-Fair Trial Controversy: Using Empirical Analysis to Strike a Desirable Balance," St. Louis University Law Journal, 1976.".
- catalog description "The data were obtained by mailing 600 questionnaires in 1970 to newspaper editors, police chiefs, prosecuting attorneys, and defense attorneys from a sample of 166 cities across the country. Questions were mainly asked concerning: 1) the degree of pretrial press publicity on pending criminal cases 2) relevant attitudes especially concerning ways of reducing the adverse effects of pretrial publicity while still having an informed public, and 30 prevailing procedures by editors, police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges. Fifty-four percent of the newspaper editors responded, 65 percent of the police chiefs, 50 percent of the prosecuting attorneys, and 48 percent of the defense attorneys, representing all fifty states.".
- catalog description "United States.".
- catalog extent "data file ( logical records) +".
- catalog isPartOf "ICPSR (Series) ; 7541.".
- catalog isPartOf "ICPSR ; 7541".
- catalog issued "1977".
- catalog issued "[1977?]".
- catalog language "und".
- catalog publisher "Ann Arbor, Mich. : Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor],".
- catalog spatial "United States".
- catalog spatial "United States.".
- catalog subject "Criminal justice personnel United States Attitudes.".
- catalog subject "Free press and fair trial United States Public opinion.".
- catalog subject "Journalists United States Attitudes.".
- catalog subject "Public opinion United States.".
- catalog subject "XII. Legal Systems.".
- catalog title "Free press, fair trial data, 1970 [computer file] / principal investigators, Stuart S. Nagel, Thomas Eimermann and Kathleen Reinbolt.".