Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/002930159/catalog> ?p ?o. }

• catalog abstract "In June 1992, accompanied by the clamor of pro-choice and anti-abortion demonstrations, the Supreme Court made its most significant statement to date about the right to an abortion under the Constitution in its decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The legal attack on a restrictive Pennsylvania law requiring parental consent, a twenty-four-hour waiting period, and spousal notification produced one of the more important constitutional confrontations in our history. Numerous parties - historians, doctors, representatives of minority groups, religious opponents, as well as the Justice Department - submitted amicus briefs presenting their position on the controversy. The lawyers for the parties examined the legal underpinnings and constitutional background to the abortion right in analytic briefs. They also presented their position in an oral argument before the Supreme Court. The final Supreme Court decision is a remarkable statement. about the state of the law, the nature of constitutional determinations, the role of the Court in our democratic society, and the Justices' personal agony about the abortion controversy. The legal record collected in this book not only examines the legal and constitutional implications but constitutes a valuable resource laying out the historical record on abortion, the medical issues, and the impact of the decision on minorities and religious groups. Fascinating to. read, the Supreme Court record is essential for anyone concerned about the political and social impact of restricting the right to an abortion.".
• catalog contributor b4254570.
• catalog contributor b4254571.
• catalog contributor b4254572.
• catalog contributor b4254573.
• catalog contributor b4254574.
• catalog created "1993.".
• catalog date "1993".
• catalog date "1993.".
• catalog dateCopyrighted "1993.".
• catalog description "In June 1992, accompanied by the clamor of pro-choice and anti-abortion demonstrations, the Supreme Court made its most significant statement to date about the right to an abortion under the Constitution in its decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. The legal attack on a restrictive Pennsylvania law requiring parental consent, a twenty-four-hour waiting period, and spousal notification produced one of the more important constitutional confrontations in our history.".
• catalog description "Introduction / Leon Friedman -- Basic Supreme Court Cases on the Right to an Abortion -- Briefs Supporting the Right to an Abortion. Brief for Petitioners and Cross-Respondents. Brief of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists et al. Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. et al. Brief of 250 American Historians -- Briefs Supporting the Pennsylvania Law Restricting Abortion. Brief for Respondents and Cross-Petitioners. Brief for the United States. Brief of the United States Catholic Conference et al. Brief of National Right to Life, Inc. -- Reply Brief for Petitioners and Cross-Respondents, April 15, 1992 -- Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court, April 22, 1992. Kathryn Kolbert on Behalf of Planned Parenthood et al. Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney General of Pennsylvania, on Behalf of the Respondent Robert P. Casey et al. Kenneth W. Starr, Solicitor General, on Behalf of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting the Respondent. Rebuttal Argument of Kathryn Kolbert on Behalf of the Petitioners -- The Supreme Court Decision, June 29, 1992. Judgment of the Court and Joint Opinion by Justices O'Connor, Kennedy, and Souter. Opinion of Justice Stevens. Opinion of Justice Blackmun. Opinion of Chief Justice Rehnquist, with whom Justice White, Justice Scalia, and Justice Thomas join. Opinion of Justice Scalia, with whom the Chief Justice, Justice White, and Justice Thomas join -- Appendix: The Amicus Briefs.".
• catalog description "Numerous parties - historians, doctors, representatives of minority groups, religious opponents, as well as the Justice Department - submitted amicus briefs presenting their position on the controversy. The lawyers for the parties examined the legal underpinnings and constitutional background to the abortion right in analytic briefs. They also presented their position in an oral argument before the Supreme Court. The final Supreme Court decision is a remarkable statement.".
• catalog description "about the state of the law, the nature of constitutional determinations, the role of the Court in our democratic society, and the Justices' personal agony about the abortion controversy. The legal record collected in this book not only examines the legal and constitutional implications but constitutes a valuable resource laying out the historical record on abortion, the medical issues, and the impact of the decision on minorities and religious groups. Fascinating to.".
• catalog description "read, the Supreme Court record is essential for anyone concerned about the political and social impact of restricting the right to an abortion.".
• catalog extent "vi, 502 p. ;".
• catalog identifier "0374272034 :".
• catalog identifier "0374523770 :".
• catalog issued "1993".
• catalog issued "1993.".
• catalog language "eng".
• catalog publisher "New York : Farrar, Straus, and Giroux,".
• catalog spatial "Pennsylvania.".
• catalog spatial "United States.".
• catalog spatial "Washington (D.C.)".
• catalog subject "344.73/04192 347.3044192 20".
• catalog subject "Abortion Law and legislation Pennsylvania.".
• catalog subject "Abortion Law and legislation United States.".
• catalog subject "Casey, Robert P. (Robert Patrick), 1932- Trials, litigation, etc.".
• catalog subject "Casey, Robert P. (Robert Patrick), 1932-2000 Trials, litigation, etc.".
• catalog subject "KF228.P5 P5 1993".
• catalog subject "Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania Trials, litigation, etc.".
• catalog subject "Trials (Abortion) Washington (D.C.)".
• catalog tableOfContents "Introduction / Leon Friedman -- Basic Supreme Court Cases on the Right to an Abortion -- Briefs Supporting the Right to an Abortion. Brief for Petitioners and Cross-Respondents. Brief of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists et al. Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. et al. Brief of 250 American Historians -- Briefs Supporting the Pennsylvania Law Restricting Abortion. Brief for Respondents and Cross-Petitioners. Brief for the United States. Brief of the United States Catholic Conference et al. Brief of National Right to Life, Inc. -- Reply Brief for Petitioners and Cross-Respondents, April 15, 1992 -- Oral Argument Before the Supreme Court, April 22, 1992. Kathryn Kolbert on Behalf of Planned Parenthood et al. Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney General of Pennsylvania, on Behalf of the Respondent Robert P. Casey et al. Kenneth W. Starr, Solicitor General, on Behalf of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting the Respondent. Rebuttal Argument of Kathryn Kolbert on Behalf of the Petitioners -- The Supreme Court Decision, June 29, 1992. Judgment of the Court and Joint Opinion by Justices O'Connor, Kennedy, and Souter. Opinion of Justice Stevens. Opinion of Justice Blackmun. Opinion of Chief Justice Rehnquist, with whom Justice White, Justice Scalia, and Justice Thomas join. Opinion of Justice Scalia, with whom the Chief Justice, Justice White, and Justice Thomas join -- Appendix: The Amicus Briefs.".
• catalog title "The Supreme Court confronts abortion : the briefs, argument, and decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey / edited and with an introduction by Leon Friedman.".
• catalog type "Trials, litigation, etc. fast".
• catalog type "text".