Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/003965675/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- catalog abstract "This report assesses the process and the multiple and growing pressures for a reexamination of U.S. global strategy and the U.S. role in the world. It argues that a new broad-ranging debate over future American strategy is both likely and desirable. It clearly behooves a smart defense planner to seek to better understand the pressures pushing for such a debate, the fault lines emerging, and the key drivers of elite and public opinion. Until the debate over future U.S. strategy is clarified, it will be difficult for military planners to proceed with clear guidance on future strategic and defense planning -- or at least until the issue of the political sustainability of such guidance is established in clear elite and public support. This should not be read as a recipe for inaction, but rather as an appeal for strategists and military planners to try to pay closer attention to issues of of domestic political consensus, legitimation, and sustainability, and to how these factors are likely to affect future U.S. strategy.".
- catalog alternative "New US strategic debate".
- catalog alternative "New United States strategic debate".
- catalog contributor b5713505.
- catalog contributor b5713506.
- catalog contributor b5713507.
- catalog contributor b5713508.
- catalog created "1993.".
- catalog date "1993".
- catalog date "1993.".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "1993.".
- catalog description "Includes bibliographical references.".
- catalog description "This report assesses the process and the multiple and growing pressures for a reexamination of U.S. global strategy and the U.S. role in the world. It argues that a new broad-ranging debate over future American strategy is both likely and desirable. It clearly behooves a smart defense planner to seek to better understand the pressures pushing for such a debate, the fault lines emerging, and the key drivers of elite and public opinion. Until the debate over future U.S. strategy is clarified, it will be difficult for military planners to proceed with clear guidance on future strategic and defense planning -- or at least until the issue of the political sustainability of such guidance is established in clear elite and public support. This should not be read as a recipe for inaction, but rather as an appeal for strategists and military planners to try to pay closer attention to issues of of domestic political consensus, legitimation, and sustainability, and to how these factors are likely to affect future U.S. strategy.".
- catalog extent "xx, 99 p. :".
- catalog hasFormat "New U.S. strategic debate.".
- catalog identifier "0833014552".
- catalog isFormatOf "New U.S. strategic debate.".
- catalog issued "1993".
- catalog issued "1993.".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog publisher "Santa Monica, CA : Rand,".
- catalog relation "New U.S. strategic debate.".
- catalog spatial "United States.".
- catalog subject "355/.033073 20".
- catalog subject "National security United States.".
- catalog subject "U23 .A737 1993".
- catalog subject "World politics 1989-".
- catalog title "New US strategic debate".
- catalog title "New United States strategic debate".
- catalog title "The new U.S. strategic debate / Ronald D. Asmus.".
- catalog type "text".