Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/004525317/catalog> ?p ?o. }

• catalog alternative "Determinationes.".
• catalog alternative "Disputation de justitia habituali et actuali".
• catalog contributor b6418562.
• catalog contributor b6418563.
• catalog contributor b6418564.
• catalog created "1844-1846.".
• catalog date "1844".
• catalog date "1844-1846.".
• catalog dateCopyrighted "1844-1846.".
• catalog description "A reply to the arguments of Gregory de Valentia -- Answers to the testimonies from the fathers which the papists are accustomed to allege -- Meets other testimonies by which they endeavour to show that neither concupiscence nor its involuntary motions are sins -- Testimonies brought from Augustine answered -- Some things premised concerning the nature of original righteousness and sin -- Proves that the regenerate are not free from original sin".
• catalog description "Argues that original sin in inherent in the regenerate -- Shews that the will is not free from original sin -- On the original contagion which adheres in the concupiscible appetite -- Shows from the fathers that no one of the regenerate is free from sin -- Testimonies of the schoolmen showing that original sin is not wholly removed from the regenerate -- That concupiscence remaining in the regenerate, and its first motions, are sins, confirmed by the opinions of fathers and schoolmen".
• catalog description "Includes bibliographical references and indexes.".
• catalog description "Of actual righteousness; or, the righteousness of works -- Of the necessity of good works -- Of the reality of good works -- Of the perfection of good works -- Of the merit of good works.".
• catalog description "The first discussion of habitual and actual righteousness -- The heads of the subsequent discussion announced -- The frauds and calumnies of the papists detected and refuted -- The first question -- whether a certain habitual or inherent righteousness is infused into all the justified, whence they may be called just? -- proposed and explained".
• catalog description "The second question -- whether this inherent righteousness is so perfect as to exclude original sin? -- the charge of the heresies of Originists, Messalians, and others, which the Jesuits bring against us answered -- Other arguments the papists derived from the scriptures considered -- Their reasonings refuted -- A refutation of the papists who contend that concupiscence remaining in the unregenerate is not sin -- Bellarmine's arguments sifted".
• catalog description "The third question -- whether inherent righteousness (whatever it be) formally justifies believers in the sight and judgment of God? -- The term justification examined -- The calumnies of opponents answered -- The state of the question and the defence of the papists described -- The arguments of Bellarmine for inherent righteousness refuted -- The arguments of Bellarmine against the imputation of Christ's righteousness answered -- The testimonies of the fathers discussed -- Inherent righteousness shewn not to be the formal cause of our justification before God -- Some things premised respecting the term imputation and formal cause -- The imputation of Christ's obedience proved to be the formal cause of our justification -- Testimonies of the fathers against inherent, and in support of imputed righteousness".
• catalog extent "2 v. :".
• catalog hasFormat "Treatise on justification.".
• catalog isFormatOf "Treatise on justification.".
• catalog issued "1844".
• catalog issued "1844-1846.".
• catalog language "eng".
• catalog language "englat".
• catalog publisher "London : Hamilton, Adams,".
• catalog relation "Treatise on justification.".
• catalog subject "BT763 .D313 1844".
• catalog subject "Justification (Christian theology)".
• catalog tableOfContents "A reply to the arguments of Gregory de Valentia -- Answers to the testimonies from the fathers which the papists are accustomed to allege -- Meets other testimonies by which they endeavour to show that neither concupiscence nor its involuntary motions are sins -- Testimonies brought from Augustine answered -- Some things premised concerning the nature of original righteousness and sin -- Proves that the regenerate are not free from original sin".
• catalog tableOfContents "Argues that original sin in inherent in the regenerate -- Shews that the will is not free from original sin -- On the original contagion which adheres in the concupiscible appetite -- Shows from the fathers that no one of the regenerate is free from sin -- Testimonies of the schoolmen showing that original sin is not wholly removed from the regenerate -- That concupiscence remaining in the regenerate, and its first motions, are sins, confirmed by the opinions of fathers and schoolmen".
• catalog tableOfContents "Of actual righteousness; or, the righteousness of works -- Of the necessity of good works -- Of the reality of good works -- Of the perfection of good works -- Of the merit of good works.".
• catalog tableOfContents "The first discussion of habitual and actual righteousness -- The heads of the subsequent discussion announced -- The frauds and calumnies of the papists detected and refuted -- The first question -- whether a certain habitual or inherent righteousness is infused into all the justified, whence they may be called just? -- proposed and explained".
• catalog tableOfContents "The second question -- whether this inherent righteousness is so perfect as to exclude original sin? -- the charge of the heresies of Originists, Messalians, and others, which the Jesuits bring against us answered -- Other arguments the papists derived from the scriptures considered -- Their reasonings refuted -- A refutation of the papists who contend that concupiscence remaining in the unregenerate is not sin -- Bellarmine's arguments sifted".
• catalog tableOfContents "The third question -- whether inherent righteousness (whatever it be) formally justifies believers in the sight and judgment of God? -- The term justification examined -- The calumnies of opponents answered -- The state of the question and the defence of the papists described -- The arguments of Bellarmine for inherent righteousness refuted -- The arguments of Bellarmine against the imputation of Christ's righteousness answered -- The testimonies of the fathers discussed -- Inherent righteousness shewn not to be the formal cause of our justification before God -- Some things premised respecting the term imputation and formal cause -- The imputation of Christ's obedience proved to be the formal cause of our justification -- Testimonies of the fathers against inherent, and in support of imputed righteousness".
• catalog title "A treatise on justification = or the Disputatio de justitia habituali et actuali, of the right Rev. John Davenant ... / together with translations of the "Determinationes" of the same prelate by the Rev. Josiah Allport.".
• catalog title "Disputation de justitia habituali et actuali".
• catalog type "text".