Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/007100397/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 30 of
30
with 100 items per page.
- catalog abstract "Candidates in Conflict provides a new perspective for understanding presidential debates by analyzing the three televised debates in 1992 among candidates Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Ross Perot. Viewed by millions and now an expected part of presidential campaigns, the debates captured the attention of the nation. The authors show that presidential candidates, by using persuasive attack and defense strategies, are able either to undermine (in the case of their opponents) or to preserve (for themselves) the vital issues of personal credibility and policy matters. The book includes complete transcripts of the debates.".
- catalog contributor b9832559.
- catalog contributor b9832560.
- catalog contributor b9832561.
- catalog created "c1996.".
- catalog date "1996".
- catalog date "c1996.".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "c1996.".
- catalog description "Candidates in Conflict provides a new perspective for understanding presidential debates by analyzing the three televised debates in 1992 among candidates Bill Clinton, George Bush, and Ross Perot. Viewed by millions and now an expected part of presidential campaigns, the debates captured the attention of the nation. The authors show that presidential candidates, by using persuasive attack and defense strategies, are able either to undermine (in the case of their opponents) or to preserve (for themselves) the vital issues of personal credibility and policy matters. The book includes complete transcripts of the debates.".
- catalog description "Includes bibliographical references (p. 239-255) and index.".
- catalog description "pt. I. Analysis of the 1992 Presidential Debates. 1. Traditional Approaches to Presidential Debates. 2. Investigating Persuasive Attack and Defense. 3. Persuasive Attack: Bush the Primary Target, Perot Relatively Unscathed. 4. Persuasive Defense: Bush on the Defensive. 5. Evaluation: How Do the Candidates Stack Up? -- pt. II. Transcripts of the 1992 Presidential Debates: Bush, Clinton, and Perot. 6. Debate One: October 11, 1992. 7. Debate Two: October 15, 1992. 8. Debate Three: October 19, 1992 -- Appendix 1: Procedures Employed in the Study -- Appendix 2: Sample Coded Transcript: Excerpts from Debate 1.".
- catalog extent "x, 261 p. ;".
- catalog identifier "0817308687 (pbk. : alk. paper)".
- catalog isPartOf "Studies in rhetoric and communication".
- catalog issued "1996".
- catalog issued "c1996.".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog publisher "Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press,".
- catalog spatial "United States".
- catalog spatial "United States.".
- catalog subject "808.53/08835 20".
- catalog subject "Campaign debates United States.".
- catalog subject "PN4055.U53 B46 1996".
- catalog subject "Political oratory United States.".
- catalog subject "Presidents United States Election 1992.".
- catalog subject "Television broadcasting of campaign debates.".
- catalog subject "Television in politics United States.".
- catalog tableOfContents "pt. I. Analysis of the 1992 Presidential Debates. 1. Traditional Approaches to Presidential Debates. 2. Investigating Persuasive Attack and Defense. 3. Persuasive Attack: Bush the Primary Target, Perot Relatively Unscathed. 4. Persuasive Defense: Bush on the Defensive. 5. Evaluation: How Do the Candidates Stack Up? -- pt. II. Transcripts of the 1992 Presidential Debates: Bush, Clinton, and Perot. 6. Debate One: October 11, 1992. 7. Debate Two: October 15, 1992. 8. Debate Three: October 19, 1992 -- Appendix 1: Procedures Employed in the Study -- Appendix 2: Sample Coded Transcript: Excerpts from Debate 1.".
- catalog title "Candidates in conflict : persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates / William L. Benoit and William T. Wells.".
- catalog type "text".