Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/008030957/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- catalog abstract ""In On the Soul 3. 1-5, Aristotle goes beyond the five senses to the general functions of sense perception, the imagination and the so-called active intellect, the identity of which was still a matter of controversy in the time of Thomas Aquinas." "In his commentary on Aristotle's text, 'Simplicius' insists that the intellect in question is not something transcendental, but the human rational soul. He denies both Plotinus' view that a part of the soul has never descended from uninterrupted contemplation of the Platonic Forms, and Proclus' view that the soul cannot be changed in its substance through embodiment." "Addressing the vexed question of authorship, H.J. Blumenthal concludes that the commentary was written neither by Simplicius nor Priscian. In a novel interpretation, he suggests that if Priscian had any hand in this commentary, it might have been as editor of notes from Simplicius' lectures."--Jacket.".
- catalog alternative ""Simplicius" on Aristotle's "On the soul 3.1-5"".
- catalog alternative "On the soul 3.1-5".
- catalog alternative "Simplicii in libros Aristotelis De anima commentaria. Selections. English".
- catalog contributor b11145864.
- catalog contributor b11145865.
- catalog contributor b11145866.
- catalog contributor b11145867.
- catalog contributor b11145868.
- catalog created "2000.".
- catalog date "2000".
- catalog date "2000.".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "2000.".
- catalog description ""In On the Soul 3. 1-5, Aristotle goes beyond the five senses to the general functions of sense perception, the imagination and the so-called active intellect, the identity of which was still a matter of controversy in the time of Thomas Aquinas." "In his commentary on Aristotle's text, 'Simplicius' insists that the intellect in question is not something transcendental, but the human rational soul. He denies both Plotinus' view that a part of the soul has never descended from uninterrupted contemplation of the Platonic Forms, and Proclus' view that the soul cannot be changed in its substance through embodiment." "Addressing the vexed question of authorship, H.J. Blumenthal concludes that the commentary was written neither by Simplicius nor Priscian. In a novel interpretation, he suggests that if Priscian had any hand in this commentary, it might have been as editor of notes from Simplicius' lectures."--Jacket.".
- catalog description "Includes bibliographical references and indexes.".
- catalog extent "viii, 188 p. ;".
- catalog hasFormat "On Aristotle's "On the Soul 3.1-5"".
- catalog identifier "0801436877".
- catalog isFormatOf "On Aristotle's "On the Soul 3.1-5"".
- catalog isPartOf "[The Ancient commentators on Aristotle]".
- catalog issued "2000".
- catalog issued "2000.".
- catalog language "Includes English-Greek and Greek-English indexes and subject indexes.".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog language "enggrc grc".
- catalog publisher "Ithaca, N.Y. : Cornell University Press,".
- catalog relation "On Aristotle's "On the Soul 3.1-5"".
- catalog subject "Aristotle. De anima. 3.1-5.".
- catalog subject "Aristotle. De anima. Book 3.".
- catalog subject "Aristotle. De anima.".
- catalog subject "B415 .S452513 2000X".
- catalog subject "Neoplatonism.".
- catalog subject "Psychology Early works to 1850.".
- catalog subject "Soul Early works to 1800.".
- catalog title ""Simplicius" on Aristotle's "On the soul 3.1-5"".
- catalog title "On Aristotle's "On the Soul 3.1-5" / Simplicius ; translated by H.J. Blumenthal.".
- catalog title "On the soul 3.1-5".
- catalog title "Simplicii in libros Aristotelis De anima commentaria. Selections. English".
- catalog type "Early works. fast".
- catalog type "text".