Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/008443199/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 items per page.
- catalog abstract "Given its potential significance for public health and the environment, the impact of radioactive releases during important steps of nuclear energy production must be considered when selecting among different fuel cycles. With this in mind, the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) has undertaken a comparative study of the radiological impacts of two main fuel cycle options: one with and one without reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. The study compares the respective impacts of the two options based on generic models and assumptions as well as actual data. It concludes that the difference between them is not significant. A wealth of recent data assembled and evaluated by an international expert team is provided in annex.".
- catalog contributor b11762915.
- catalog created "2000.".
- catalog date "2000".
- catalog date "2000.".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "2000.".
- catalog description "Foreword -- Executive Summary -- 1. Scope of the Study -- 2. the Principles of Radiological Protection -- 3. Fuel Cycle Facilities and Radioactive Discharges -- 4. Dose Estimation for Workers -- 5. Methodology for Generic Dose Assessment -- 6. Dose Estimation for the Public -- 7. Conclusions -- Members of the Expert Group -- Bibliography -- Annex A. Technical, Site-Specific Information -- Annex B. Generic Dose Assessment of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle -- Annex C. Glossary and Conversion Factors".
- catalog description "Given its potential significance for public health and the environment, the impact of radioactive releases during important steps of nuclear energy production must be considered when selecting among different fuel cycles. With this in mind, the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) has undertaken a comparative study of the radiological impacts of two main fuel cycle options: one with and one without reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. The study compares the respective impacts of the two options based on generic models and assumptions as well as actual data. It concludes that the difference between them is not significant. A wealth of recent data assembled and evaluated by an international expert team is provided in annex.".
- catalog description "Includes bibliographical references.".
- catalog extent "124 p. ;".
- catalog identifier "9264176578".
- catalog isPartOf "Radiation Protection, 1990-0600.".
- catalog issued "2000".
- catalog issued "2000.".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog publisher "Paris : OECD Nuclear Energy Agency,".
- catalog subject "600 1".
- catalog subject "Ionizing radiation Dose-response relationship.".
- catalog subject "Ionizing radiation Health aspects.".
- catalog subject "Nuclear energy Health aspects.".
- catalog subject "Nuclear fuels Management.".
- catalog subject "Public Health Impact of Radioactivity".
- catalog subject "Radioactive wastes Vitrification.".
- catalog subject "Spent reactor fuels Management.".
- catalog subject "TK9360 .O717 2000".
- catalog tableOfContents "Foreword -- Executive Summary -- 1. Scope of the Study -- 2. the Principles of Radiological Protection -- 3. Fuel Cycle Facilities and Radioactive Discharges -- 4. Dose Estimation for Workers -- 5. Methodology for Generic Dose Assessment -- 6. Dose Estimation for the Public -- 7. Conclusions -- Members of the Expert Group -- Bibliography -- Annex A. Technical, Site-Specific Information -- Annex B. Generic Dose Assessment of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle -- Annex C. Glossary and Conversion Factors".
- catalog title "Radiological impacts of spent nuclear fuel management options : a comparative study.".
- catalog type "text".