Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/008444432/catalog> ?p ?o. }

• catalog contributor b11764993.
• catalog created "2000.".
• catalog date "2000".
• catalog date "2000.".
• catalog dateCopyrighted "2000.".
• catalog description "1. The essential element of the unjust factor -- 2. Determining the proper law of the unjust factor -- 2.1 Mistake -- 2.2 Illegitimate pressure -- 2.3 Failure of consideration -- 2.4 Unauthorised transfer -- 2.5 Restitution for wrongs -- 2.6 Legal compulsion -- 2.7 Ultra vires payments -- 2.8 Illegality and incapacity -- 3. Unjust and unjustified -- Part IV: Jurisdiction in restitutionary claims -- 9. JURISDICTION UNDER THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION -- 1. Background to the convention -- 2. Interpreting the convention -- 3. The scope of the convention -- 4. Application of the convention -- 4.1 The general rule -- 4.2 Special jurisdiction -- 4.2.1 Article 5(1) -- Matters relating to a contract -- 4.2.2 Article 5(3) -- Matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict -- 4.3 Particular types of restitutionary claims -- 4.3.1 Restitutionary claims connected with a contract -- Article 5(1) -- 4.3.2 Choice of court agreements -- Article 17 -- ".
• catalog description "2. The process of characterization -- 2.1 Problems associated with characterisation -- 2.2 The "thing" to be characterised? -- 3. CHARACTERISATION OF RESTITUTIONARY CLAIMS -- 1. One issue or several -- 2. The arguments in favour of a single characterisation issue -- 2.1 Consistent with the approach in relation to contract and tort -- 2.2 Permutations of legal systems -- 2.3 Consistent with authority -- 2.4 Macmillan v. Bishopsgate: which is the issue? -- 4. SPECIFIC RESTITUTIONARY CHARACTERISATIONS -- 1. Restitution and contract -- 1.1 Independent restitutionary issue -- 1.2 The scope of the restitutionary issue -- 1.3 Restitution for breach of contract -- 2. Characterisation of equitable rights and obligations -- 3. Proprietary restitution -- 3.1 The proprietary approach -- 3.1.1 Characterisation of issuees affecting property -- 3.1.2 Proprietary restitution as part of the law of property -- 3.2 The restitutionary approach to characterisation -- ".
• catalog description "3.2.1 A pure restitutionary characterisation -- 3.3 The "equity" aspect of proprietary restitution -- 3.3.1 The in personam nature of equity -- 3.3.2 In personam characterisation of proprietary restitution -- 3.3.3 Equitable interests created via consensual transfers -- 3.4 The hybrid approach to the characterisation of proprietary restitution -- 3.4.1 The scope of the ancillary proprietary issue -- 4. Characterisation of restitution for wrongs -- 4.1 Characterisation as "wrongs" -- 4.2 Case dealing with international restitution for wongs -- 4.3 Characterisation of equitable wrongs -- 4.3.1 Characterisation of equitable wrongs as breaches of trust -- 4.3.2 Characterisation of equitable wrongs as breaches of contract -- 4.3.3 Characterisation of equitable wrongs as "wrongs" -- 4.3.4 Claims for "knowing receipt" -- 5. A separate issue of tracing? -- 5.1 The tracing problem -- 5.2 The approaches -- 5.2.1 Procedural or substantive issue? -- 5.2.2 A separate choice of law rule? -- ".
• catalog description "4.3.3 Proprietary restitutionary claims in relation to land -- Article 16(1) -- 4.4 Other particular types of restitutionary claims -- 4.4.1 Claims in equity -- 4.4.2 Proprietary restitution -- 4.4.3 Restitution for wrongs -- 10. JURISDICTION UNDER THE COMMON LAW RULES -- 1. Service out of the jurisdiction -- 2. Heads of jurisdiction -- 2.1 Sub-rule (15): claim for restitution -- 2.1.1 Questions of choice of law -- 2.2 Sub-rules (5) and (6): claims in relation to contracts -- 2.2.1 Implied contract made within the jurisdiction -- 2.2.2 Breach of implied contract within the jurisdiction -- 2.2.3 The preferred aproach -- 2.2.4 Restitutionary claims connected with a contract -- 2.3 Sub-rule (8): claims in tort -- 2.3.1 Meanings of "tort" -- 2.3.2 Damage sustained within the jurisdiction -- 2.3.3 Act committed within the jurisdiction -- 2.4 Sub-rule (10): property within the jurisdiction -- CONCLUSION -- Appendix -- Index".
• catalog description "5.2.3 Characterisation of tracing -- 5.2.4 Interest in the tracing process -- 5.3 Ancillary issues -- 5.3.1 Intermediate purchases or acquisitions -- 5.3.2 Tracing in equity and at law -- 6. Negotiorum gestio -- 5. THEORETICAL ISSUES -- 1. Renvoi -- 2. The incidental question".
• catalog description "INTRODUCTION -- Part I: A map through the law of restitution -- 1. A MAP THROUGH THE LAW OF RESTITUTION -- 1. The existence of a separate law of restitution -- 2. The elements of a restitutionary claim -- 2.1 Enrichment -- 2.2 At the plaintiff's expense -- 2.3 Unjust receipt of the value of the benefit -- 3. Personal and proprietary remedies -- proprietary restitution -- 3.1 The nature of proprietary restitution -- 3.2 Proprietary claims and proprietary restitution -- 3.3 Circumstances giving rise to proprietary restitution -- 4. Restitution for wrongs -- 4.1 Availability of restitution for wrongs -- 4.2 Taxonomic location of restitution for wrongs -- 5. Tracing -- 5.1 What is tracing -- 5.2 Why do we trace? -- 5.3 Tracing at law and in equity -- 6. Defences -- 6.1 Change of position -- 6.2 Defence of Bona Fide purchaser -- Part II: Characterisation of restitutionary claims -- 2. CHARACTERISATION IN GENERAL -- 1. The need for characterization -- ".
• catalog description "Includes bibliographical references (p. [xxxv]-xxxvi) and index.".
• catalog description "Part III: Choice of law rules for restitutionary issues -- 6. THE EXISTING AUTHORITIES -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Dicey and Morris -- 3. U.S. restatement -- 4. Other academic opinion -- 5. The English law case -- 6. Other common law cases -- 7. THE VARIOUS PROPOSED CHOICE OF LAW RULES -- 1. The place of enrichment rule -- 1.1 Arguments in favour of place of enrichment rule -- 1.2 Arguments against the place of enrichment rule -- 1.2.1 Unsound foundation -- 1.2.2 No general "place of enrichment" rule -- 1.2.3 Ignoring other elements of a restitutionary claim -- 1.2.4 Arbitrary result -- 1.2.5 Meaning of place of enrichment -- 2. Lex fori -- 3. Multiple choice of law rules -- 3.1 Law of the contract -- 3.2 Law of the relationship -- 3.3 Lex situs of immovables -- 4. Proper law of the obligation -- 5. Proposed convention on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations -- 5.1 Scope of the draft proposal -- 5.2 Choice of law rule -- 8. PREFERRED CHOICE OF LAW RULE -- ".
• catalog extent "xxxvi, 274 p. ;".
• catalog hasFormat "Restitution in private international law.".
• catalog identifier "1841131423".
• catalog isFormatOf "Restitution in private international law.".
• catalog issued "2000".
• catalog issued "2000.".
• catalog language "eng".
• catalog publisher "Oxford ; Portland, Or. : Hart Pub.,".
• catalog relation "Restitution in private international law.".
• catalog subject "Conflict of laws Restitution.".
• catalog subject "Conflict of laws Unjust enrichment.".
• catalog subject "K7310 .P36 2000".
• catalog tableOfContents "1. The essential element of the unjust factor -- 2. Determining the proper law of the unjust factor -- 2.1 Mistake -- 2.2 Illegitimate pressure -- 2.3 Failure of consideration -- 2.4 Unauthorised transfer -- 2.5 Restitution for wrongs -- 2.6 Legal compulsion -- 2.7 Ultra vires payments -- 2.8 Illegality and incapacity -- 3. Unjust and unjustified -- Part IV: Jurisdiction in restitutionary claims -- 9. JURISDICTION UNDER THE BRUSSELS CONVENTION -- 1. Background to the convention -- 2. Interpreting the convention -- 3. The scope of the convention -- 4. Application of the convention -- 4.1 The general rule -- 4.2 Special jurisdiction -- 4.2.1 Article 5(1) -- Matters relating to a contract -- 4.2.2 Article 5(3) -- Matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict -- 4.3 Particular types of restitutionary claims -- 4.3.1 Restitutionary claims connected with a contract -- Article 5(1) -- 4.3.2 Choice of court agreements -- Article 17 -- ".
• catalog tableOfContents "2. The process of characterization -- 2.1 Problems associated with characterisation -- 2.2 The "thing" to be characterised? -- 3. CHARACTERISATION OF RESTITUTIONARY CLAIMS -- 1. One issue or several -- 2. The arguments in favour of a single characterisation issue -- 2.1 Consistent with the approach in relation to contract and tort -- 2.2 Permutations of legal systems -- 2.3 Consistent with authority -- 2.4 Macmillan v. Bishopsgate: which is the issue? -- 4. SPECIFIC RESTITUTIONARY CHARACTERISATIONS -- 1. Restitution and contract -- 1.1 Independent restitutionary issue -- 1.2 The scope of the restitutionary issue -- 1.3 Restitution for breach of contract -- 2. Characterisation of equitable rights and obligations -- 3. Proprietary restitution -- 3.1 The proprietary approach -- 3.1.1 Characterisation of issuees affecting property -- 3.1.2 Proprietary restitution as part of the law of property -- 3.2 The restitutionary approach to characterisation -- ".
• catalog tableOfContents "3.2.1 A pure restitutionary characterisation -- 3.3 The "equity" aspect of proprietary restitution -- 3.3.1 The in personam nature of equity -- 3.3.2 In personam characterisation of proprietary restitution -- 3.3.3 Equitable interests created via consensual transfers -- 3.4 The hybrid approach to the characterisation of proprietary restitution -- 3.4.1 The scope of the ancillary proprietary issue -- 4. Characterisation of restitution for wrongs -- 4.1 Characterisation as "wrongs" -- 4.2 Case dealing with international restitution for wongs -- 4.3 Characterisation of equitable wrongs -- 4.3.1 Characterisation of equitable wrongs as breaches of trust -- 4.3.2 Characterisation of equitable wrongs as breaches of contract -- 4.3.3 Characterisation of equitable wrongs as "wrongs" -- 4.3.4 Claims for "knowing receipt" -- 5. A separate issue of tracing? -- 5.1 The tracing problem -- 5.2 The approaches -- 5.2.1 Procedural or substantive issue? -- 5.2.2 A separate choice of law rule? -- ".
• catalog tableOfContents "4.3.3 Proprietary restitutionary claims in relation to land -- Article 16(1) -- 4.4 Other particular types of restitutionary claims -- 4.4.1 Claims in equity -- 4.4.2 Proprietary restitution -- 4.4.3 Restitution for wrongs -- 10. JURISDICTION UNDER THE COMMON LAW RULES -- 1. Service out of the jurisdiction -- 2. Heads of jurisdiction -- 2.1 Sub-rule (15): claim for restitution -- 2.1.1 Questions of choice of law -- 2.2 Sub-rules (5) and (6): claims in relation to contracts -- 2.2.1 Implied contract made within the jurisdiction -- 2.2.2 Breach of implied contract within the jurisdiction -- 2.2.3 The preferred aproach -- 2.2.4 Restitutionary claims connected with a contract -- 2.3 Sub-rule (8): claims in tort -- 2.3.1 Meanings of "tort" -- 2.3.2 Damage sustained within the jurisdiction -- 2.3.3 Act committed within the jurisdiction -- 2.4 Sub-rule (10): property within the jurisdiction -- CONCLUSION -- Appendix -- Index".
• catalog tableOfContents "5.2.3 Characterisation of tracing -- 5.2.4 Interest in the tracing process -- 5.3 Ancillary issues -- 5.3.1 Intermediate purchases or acquisitions -- 5.3.2 Tracing in equity and at law -- 6. Negotiorum gestio -- 5. THEORETICAL ISSUES -- 1. Renvoi -- 2. The incidental question".
• catalog tableOfContents "INTRODUCTION -- Part I: A map through the law of restitution -- 1. A MAP THROUGH THE LAW OF RESTITUTION -- 1. The existence of a separate law of restitution -- 2. The elements of a restitutionary claim -- 2.1 Enrichment -- 2.2 At the plaintiff's expense -- 2.3 Unjust receipt of the value of the benefit -- 3. Personal and proprietary remedies -- proprietary restitution -- 3.1 The nature of proprietary restitution -- 3.2 Proprietary claims and proprietary restitution -- 3.3 Circumstances giving rise to proprietary restitution -- 4. Restitution for wrongs -- 4.1 Availability of restitution for wrongs -- 4.2 Taxonomic location of restitution for wrongs -- 5. Tracing -- 5.1 What is tracing -- 5.2 Why do we trace? -- 5.3 Tracing at law and in equity -- 6. Defences -- 6.1 Change of position -- 6.2 Defence of Bona Fide purchaser -- Part II: Characterisation of restitutionary claims -- 2. CHARACTERISATION IN GENERAL -- 1. The need for characterization -- ".
• catalog tableOfContents "Part III: Choice of law rules for restitutionary issues -- 6. THE EXISTING AUTHORITIES -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Dicey and Morris -- 3. U.S. restatement -- 4. Other academic opinion -- 5. The English law case -- 6. Other common law cases -- 7. THE VARIOUS PROPOSED CHOICE OF LAW RULES -- 1. The place of enrichment rule -- 1.1 Arguments in favour of place of enrichment rule -- 1.2 Arguments against the place of enrichment rule -- 1.2.1 Unsound foundation -- 1.2.2 No general "place of enrichment" rule -- 1.2.3 Ignoring other elements of a restitutionary claim -- 1.2.4 Arbitrary result -- 1.2.5 Meaning of place of enrichment -- 2. Lex fori -- 3. Multiple choice of law rules -- 3.1 Law of the contract -- 3.2 Law of the relationship -- 3.3 Lex situs of immovables -- 4. Proper law of the obligation -- 5. Proposed convention on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations -- 5.1 Scope of the draft proposal -- 5.2 Choice of law rule -- 8. PREFERRED CHOICE OF LAW RULE -- ".
• catalog title "Restitution in private international law / George Panagopoulos.".
• catalog type "text".