Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/008653865/catalog> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 28 of
28
with 100 items per page.
- catalog abstract ""Of all the Supreme Court's criminal cases, its decision in Miranda v. Arizona has been the most controversial. When the case was decided in 1966, conservatives expressed the fear that law enforcement would be irreparably harmed because Miranda would significantly diminish the possibility of convicting a suspect on the basis of his confession. Over the past three decades, scholars, as well as those associated with law enforcement, have attacked Miranda on both constitutional and policy grounds. When the Supreme Court reaffirmed Miranda in United States v. Dickerson on June 26, 2000, conservatives complained about that decision's adverse impact on law enforcement. Liberals, on the other hand, hailed the decision as a reaffirmation of individual rights." "Welsh S. White looks at both sides of the issue. Emphasizing that Miranda represents merely one stage in the Court's ongoing struggle to accommodate a fundamental conflict between law enforcement and civil liberties, White traces the history of the Court's efforts to regulate police interrogation practices and assesses whether the Court's present decisions (including Miranda) strike an appropriate balance between promoting law enforcement's interest in obtaining reliable evidence and the Individual's interest in being protected from overreaching police practices." "In making this inquiry, White is concerned not only with the controlling legal principles but also with the realities of police interrogation. Drawing from extensive empirical evidence, including transcripts of actual police questioning, White presents striking examples of modern police interrogation practices. Based on the grim picture revealed, White proposes specific approaches that the Supreme Court should take to address the current problems."--Jacket.".
- catalog alternative "Project Muse UPCC books net".
- catalog contributor b12121396.
- catalog created "c2001.".
- catalog date "2001".
- catalog date "c2001.".
- catalog dateCopyrighted "c2001.".
- catalog description ""Of all the Supreme Court's criminal cases, its decision in Miranda v. Arizona has been the most controversial. When the case was decided in 1966, conservatives expressed the fear that law enforcement would be irreparably harmed because Miranda would significantly diminish the possibility of convicting a suspect on the basis of his confession. Over the past three decades, scholars, as well as those associated with law enforcement, have attacked Miranda on both constitutional and policy grounds. When the Supreme Court reaffirmed Miranda in United States v. Dickerson on June 26, 2000, conservatives complained about that decision's adverse impact on law enforcement. Liberals, on the other hand, hailed the decision as a reaffirmation of individual rights." "Welsh S. White looks at both sides of the issue. Emphasizing that Miranda represents merely one stage in the Court's ongoing struggle to accommodate a fundamental conflict between law enforcement and civil liberties, White traces the history of the Court's efforts to regulate police interrogation practices and assesses whether the Court's present decisions (including Miranda) strike an appropriate balance between promoting law enforcement's interest in obtaining reliable evidence and the Individual's interest in being protected from overreaching police practices." "In making this inquiry, White is concerned not only with the controlling legal principles but also with the realities of police interrogation. Drawing from extensive empirical evidence, including transcripts of actual police questioning, White presents striking examples of modern police interrogation practices. Based on the grim picture revealed, White proposes specific approaches that the Supreme Court should take to address the current problems."--Jacket.".
- catalog description "Includes bibliographical references and index.".
- catalog description "Introduction -- The third degree -- The evolution of modern police interrogation practices -- The due process voluntariness test -- Miranda and its immediate aftermath -- Miranda's subsequent history -- How modern interrogators have adapted to Miranda -- Dickerson -- Miranda's limitations -- The third degree redux -- Police-induced false confessions: the scope of the problem -- Examples of police-induced false confessions -- Providing adequate fact-finding in interrogation cases -- Regulating interrogation practices in the twenty-first century -- Conclusion.".
- catalog extent "viii, 230 p. ;".
- catalog hasFormat "Miranda's waning protections.".
- catalog identifier "0472111728 (cloth : alk. paper)".
- catalog isFormatOf "Miranda's waning protections.".
- catalog issued "2001".
- catalog issued "c2001.".
- catalog language "eng".
- catalog publisher "Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press,".
- catalog relation "Miranda's waning protections.".
- catalog spatial "United States.".
- catalog subject "345.73/056 21".
- catalog subject "Criminal investigation United States.".
- catalog subject "KF9625 .W48 2001".
- catalog subject "Police questioning United States.".
- catalog subject "Right to counsel United States.".
- catalog tableOfContents "Introduction -- The third degree -- The evolution of modern police interrogation practices -- The due process voluntariness test -- Miranda and its immediate aftermath -- Miranda's subsequent history -- How modern interrogators have adapted to Miranda -- Dickerson -- Miranda's limitations -- The third degree redux -- Police-induced false confessions: the scope of the problem -- Examples of police-induced false confessions -- Providing adequate fact-finding in interrogation cases -- Regulating interrogation practices in the twenty-first century -- Conclusion.".
- catalog title "Miranda's waning protections : police interrogation practices after Dickerson / Welsh S. White.".
- catalog type "text".