Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/008995378/catalog> ?p ?o. }

• catalog abstract "In October 2001, the Department of Defense (DoD) awarded the System Development and Demonstration contract to Lockheed Martin Corporation to proceed with the next phase of the $300 billion, two-decade-long development and production of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). Congress later directed DoD, which in turn asked RAND, to examine reasonable alternative locations and strategies for the final assembly and checkout (FACO) process. The authors considered alternatives to the current single-site approach in which Lockheed Martin will perform all JSF FACO at its Fort Worth, Texas, plant. RAND looked at single- and multiple-site options for carrying out FACO among four plants nationwide, including the Fort Worth site. The authors found that no efficiency, effectiveness, or cost reasons exist to split FACO operations between two sites or across multiple sites. In addition, moving some or all FACO from Fort Worth to another location would result in additional costs to DoD. The analysis also assessed reasons for splitting FACO that might reflect benefits not included in the authors' cost estimates, including such issues as the distribution of economic benefits to more than one region and the facilitation of competition among alternative sites. However, none of these was compelling enough to consider splitting the.".
• catalog contributor b12642836.
• catalog contributor b12642837.
• catalog contributor b12642838.
• catalog coverage "United States Armed Forces Procurement.".
• catalog created "2002.".
• catalog date "2002".
• catalog date "2002.".
• catalog dateCopyrighted "2002.".
• catalog description "Ch. 1. Introduction -- Ch. 2. Splitting Production -- Ch. 3. Site Selection Issues: Plant and Major Facility Requirements for FACO -- Ch. 4. JSF Workforce Issues -- Ch. 5. Indirect Costs -- Ch. 6. State and Local Tax Credits and Incentives -- Ch. 7. Environmental Costs -- Ch. 8. Other Cost Factors: Stealth, Suppliers, and Energy -- Ch. 9. Modeling the Cost Implications of Alternative FACO Strategies for JSF Production -- Ch. 10. Results -- Ch. 11. Conclusions -- App. A. Legislative Language: The Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001.".
• catalog description "In October 2001, the Department of Defense (DoD) awarded the System Development and Demonstration contract to Lockheed Martin Corporation to proceed with the next phase of the $300 billion, two-decade-long development and production of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). Congress later directed DoD, which in turn asked RAND, to examine reasonable alternative locations and strategies for the final assembly and checkout (FACO) process. The authors considered alternatives to the current single-site approach in which Lockheed Martin will perform all JSF FACO at its Fort Worth, Texas, plant. RAND looked at single- and multiple-site options for carrying out FACO among four plants nationwide, including the Fort Worth site. The authors found that no efficiency, effectiveness, or cost reasons exist to split FACO operations between two sites or across multiple sites. In addition, moving some or all FACO from Fort Worth to another location would result in additional costs to DoD. The analysis also assessed reasons for splitting FACO that might reflect benefits not included in the authors' cost estimates, including such issues as the distribution of economic benefits to more than one region and the facilitation of competition among alternative sites. However, none of these was compelling enough to consider splitting the.".
• catalog description "Includes bibliographical references.".
• catalog extent "xxvi, 200 p. ;".
• catalog identifier "0833032100".
• catalog issued "2002".
• catalog issued "2002.".
• catalog language "eng".
• catalog publisher "Santa Monica, Calif. : Rand,".
• catalog spatial "United States Armed Forces Procurement.".
• catalog subject "623.7/464/0973 21".
• catalog subject "F-35 (Jet fighter plane)".
• catalog subject "F-35 (Military aircraft)".
• catalog subject "UG1242.F5 F538 2002".
• catalog tableOfContents "Ch. 1. Introduction -- Ch. 2. Splitting Production -- Ch. 3. Site Selection Issues: Plant and Major Facility Requirements for FACO -- Ch. 4. JSF Workforce Issues -- Ch. 5. Indirect Costs -- Ch. 6. State and Local Tax Credits and Incentives -- Ch. 7. Environmental Costs -- Ch. 8. Other Cost Factors: Stealth, Suppliers, and Energy -- Ch. 9. Modeling the Cost Implications of Alternative FACO Strategies for JSF Production -- Ch. 10. Results -- Ch. 11. Conclusions -- App. A. Legislative Language: The Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001.".
• catalog title "Final assembly and checkout alternatives for the joint strike fighter / Cynthia R. Cook ... [et al.].".
• catalog type "text".