Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Harvard for { <http://id.lib.harvard.edu/aleph/009296356/catalog> ?p ?o. }

• catalog abstract "The Semantic Web is a major endeavor aimed at enriching the existing Web withmetadataandprocessingmethodssoastoprovideWeb-basedsystemswith advanced(so-calledintelligent)capabilities,inparticularwithcontext-awareness and decision support. The advanced capabilities striven for in most Semantic Web application s- narios primarily call for reasoning. Reasoning capabilities are o?ered by exi- ing Semantic Web languages, such as BPEL4WS, BPML, ConsVISor, DAML-S, JTP, TRIPLE, and others. These languages, however, were developed mostly from functionality-centered (e.g., ontology reasoning or access validation) or application-centered (e.g., Web service retrieval and composition) perspectives. A perspective centered on the reasoning techniques (e.g., forward or backward chaining, tableau-like methods, constraint reasoning, etc.) complementing the above-mentioned activities appears desirable for Semantic Web systems and - plications. The workshop on “Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reas- ing,” which took place on December 8, 2003, in Mumbai, India, was the ?rst of a series of scienti?c meetings devoted to such a perspective. JustasthecurrentWebisinherentlyheterogeneousindataformatsanddata semantics, the Semantic Web will be inherently heterogeneous in its reasoning forms.Indeed,anysingleformof reasoningturnsouttobeirrealin theSemantic Web. For example, ontology reasoning in general relies on monotonic negation (for the metadata often can be fully speci?ed), while databases, Web databases, and Web-based information systems call for non-monotonic reasoning (for one would not specify non-existing trains in a railway timetable); constraint reas- ing is needed when dealing with time (for time intervals have to be dealt with), while(forwardand/orbackward)chainingisthereasoningofchoicewhencoping with database-like views (for views, i.e., virtual data, can be derived from actual data using operations such as join and projections).".
• catalog contributor b13119759.
• catalog contributor b13119760.
• catalog contributor b13119761.
• catalog contributor b13119762.
• catalog created "2003.".
• catalog date "2003".
• catalog date "2003.".
• catalog dateCopyrighted "2003.".
• catalog description "Composing Frameworks and Components for Families of Semantic Web Applications / Luis Ajimann -- Semantic Web Logic Programming Tools / Jose Julia Alferes, Carlos Viegas Domano and Luis Moniz Pereira -- Web Rules Need Two Kinds of Negation / Gerd Wagner -- Towards the Adaptive Semantic Web / Peter Dolog, Nicola Henze, Wolfgang Negdl and Michael Sintek.".
• catalog description "Includes bibliographical references and index.".
• catalog description "The Semantic Web is a major endeavor aimed at enriching the existing Web withmetadataandprocessingmethodssoastoprovideWeb-basedsystemswith advanced(so-calledintelligent)capabilities,inparticularwithcontext-awareness and decision support. The advanced capabilities striven for in most Semantic Web application s- narios primarily call for reasoning. Reasoning capabilities are o?ered by exi- ing Semantic Web languages, such as BPEL4WS, BPML, ConsVISor, DAML-S, JTP, TRIPLE, and others. These languages, however, were developed mostly from functionality-centered (e.g., ontology reasoning or access validation) or application-centered (e.g., Web service retrieval and composition) perspectives. A perspective centered on the reasoning techniques (e.g., forward or backward chaining, tableau-like methods, constraint reasoning, etc.) complementing the above-mentioned activities appears desirable for Semantic Web systems and - plications. The workshop on “Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reas- ing,” which took place on December 8, 2003, in Mumbai, India, was the ?rst of a series of scienti?c meetings devoted to such a perspective. JustasthecurrentWebisinherentlyheterogeneousindataformatsanddata semantics, the Semantic Web will be inherently heterogeneous in its reasoning forms.Indeed,anysingleformof reasoningturnsouttobeirrealin theSemantic Web. For example, ontology reasoning in general relies on monotonic negation (for the metadata often can be fully speci?ed), while databases, Web databases, and Web-based information systems call for non-monotonic reasoning (for one would not specify non-existing trains in a railway timetable); constraint reas- ing is needed when dealing with time (for time intervals have to be dealt with), while(forwardand/orbackward)chainingisthereasoningofchoicewhencoping with database-like views (for views, i.e., virtual data, can be derived from actual data using operations such as join and projections).".
• catalog extent "x, 207 p. :".
• catalog identifier "3540205829 (alk. paper)".
• catalog isPartOf "Lecture notes in computer science ; 2901".
• catalog issued "2003".
• catalog issued "2003.".
• catalog language "eng".
• catalog publisher "Berlin ; New York : Springer,".
• catalog subject "025.04 22".
• catalog subject "Artificial intelligence.".
• catalog subject "Computer science.".
• catalog subject "Information storage and retrieval systems.".
• catalog subject "Information systems.".
• catalog subject "Semantic Web Congresses.".
• catalog subject "Software engineering.".
• catalog subject "TK5105.88815 .P67 2003".
• catalog tableOfContents "Composing Frameworks and Components for Families of Semantic Web Applications / Luis Ajimann -- Semantic Web Logic Programming Tools / Jose Julia Alferes, Carlos Viegas Domano and Luis Moniz Pereira -- Web Rules Need Two Kinds of Negation / Gerd Wagner -- Towards the Adaptive Semantic Web / Peter Dolog, Nicola Henze, Wolfgang Negdl and Michael Sintek.".
• catalog title "Principles and practice of Semantic Web reasoning : international workshop, PPSWR 2003, Mumbai, India, December 8, 2003 : proceedings / François Bry, Nicola Henze, Jan Małuszyński (eds.).".
• catalog type "Bombay (2003) swd".
• catalog type "Conference proceedings. fast".
• catalog type "text".