Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in Library of Congress for { <http://lccn.loc.gov/2009025868> ?p ?o. }

• 2009025868 abstract "Collects essays that offer varying perspectives on issues related to the Supreme Court of the United States.".
• 2009025868 alternative "United States Supreme Court".
• 2009025868 contributor B11423884.
• 2009025868 created "c2010.".
• 2009025868 date "2010".
• 2009025868 date "c2010.".
• 2009025868 dateCopyrighted "c2010.".
• 2009025868 description "Collects essays that offer varying perspectives on issues related to the Supreme Court of the United States.".
• 2009025868 description "Includes bibliographical references (p. 219-222) and index.".
• 2009025868 description "The U.S. Supreme Court can be a check on the executive branch / David von Drehle -- The U.S. Supreme Court is not an effective check on the executive branch / Lisa L. Miller -- The U.S. Supreme Court should decide the rights of enemy combatants / David D. Cole -- The fate of enemy combatants is not a matter for judicial review / Mark R. Levin -- Some conservative justices have violated the rule of law for political reasons / Center for American Progress -- Liberals exercise too much control over the U.S. judiciary / Mark W. Smith -- The U.S. judiciary should be independent and impartial / Frederic F. Fleishauer -- The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold sodomy laws / Robert Peters -- The U.S. Supreme Court should reverse sodomy laws / Randy E. Barnett -- The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Roe v. Wade / James F. Pontuso -- The U.S. Supreme Court should not overturn Roe v. Wade / Cass Sunstein -- The U.S. Supreme Court should limit the role of religion in public life / Frederick S. Lane -- The U.S. Supreme Court should not limit the role of religion in public life / Robert Bork -- Political ideology is relevant in U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings / Center for American Progress contributor -- Political ideology is not relevant for judicial nominees / Orrin Hatch -- Religious views are a relevant consideration for U.S. Supreme Court nominees / Annie Laurie Gaylor -- There should not be a religious litmus test for U.S. Supreme Court nominees / Stephen B. Presser and Charles E. Rice -- There should be term limits for U.S. Supreme Court justices / Doug Bandow -- There are advantages and disadvantages to term limits for U.S. Supreme Court justices / Richard A. Posner -- The U.S. Supreme Court should refer to foreign court decisions / Austen L. Parrish -- The U.S. Supreme Court should not refer to foreign court decisions / Phyllis Schlafly -- Judicial activism is necessary in certain circumstances / Clint Bolick -- U.S. Supreme Court justices should not practice judicial activism / Robert P. George.".
• 2009025868 extent "233 p. :".
• 2009025868 identifier "0737745444 (hbk.)".
• 2009025868 identifier "0737745452 (pbk.)".
• 2009025868 identifier "9780737745443 (hbk.)".
• 2009025868 identifier "9780737745450 (pbk.)".
• 2009025868 isPartOf "Opposing viewpoints series (Unnumbered)".
• 2009025868 isPartOf "Opposing viewpoints series".
• 2009025868 issued "2010".
• 2009025868 issued "c2010.".
• 2009025868 language "eng".
• 2009025868 publisher "Farmington Hills, MI : Greenhaven Press,".
• 2009025868 spatial "United States".
• 2009025868 spatial "United States.".
• 2009025868 subject "347.73/26 22".
• 2009025868 subject "Church and state United States.".
• 2009025868 subject "Constitutional law United States Philosophy.".
• 2009025868 subject "Judges Selection and appointment United States.".
• 2009025868 subject "Judicial process United States.".
• 2009025868 subject "KF8742 .U18 2010".
• 2009025868 subject "Political questions and judicial power United States.".
• 2009025868 subject "United States. Supreme Court Officials and employees Selection and appointment.".
• 2009025868 subject "United States. Supreme Court.".
• 2009025868 tableOfContents "The U.S. Supreme Court can be a check on the executive branch / David von Drehle -- The U.S. Supreme Court is not an effective check on the executive branch / Lisa L. Miller -- The U.S. Supreme Court should decide the rights of enemy combatants / David D. Cole -- The fate of enemy combatants is not a matter for judicial review / Mark R. Levin -- Some conservative justices have violated the rule of law for political reasons / Center for American Progress -- Liberals exercise too much control over the U.S. judiciary / Mark W. Smith -- The U.S. judiciary should be independent and impartial / Frederic F. Fleishauer -- The U.S. Supreme Court should uphold sodomy laws / Robert Peters -- The U.S. Supreme Court should reverse sodomy laws / Randy E. Barnett -- The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Roe v. Wade / James F. Pontuso -- The U.S. Supreme Court should not overturn Roe v. Wade / Cass Sunstein -- The U.S. Supreme Court should limit the role of religion in public life / Frederick S. Lane -- The U.S. Supreme Court should not limit the role of religion in public life / Robert Bork -- Political ideology is relevant in U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearings / Center for American Progress contributor -- Political ideology is not relevant for judicial nominees / Orrin Hatch -- Religious views are a relevant consideration for U.S. Supreme Court nominees / Annie Laurie Gaylor -- There should not be a religious litmus test for U.S. Supreme Court nominees / Stephen B. Presser and Charles E. Rice -- There should be term limits for U.S. Supreme Court justices / Doug Bandow -- There are advantages and disadvantages to term limits for U.S. Supreme Court justices / Richard A. Posner -- The U.S. Supreme Court should refer to foreign court decisions / Austen L. Parrish -- The U.S. Supreme Court should not refer to foreign court decisions / Phyllis Schlafly -- Judicial activism is necessary in certain circumstances / Clint Bolick -- U.S. Supreme Court justices should not practice judicial activism / Robert P. George.".
• 2009025868 title "The U.S. Supreme Court / Margaret Haerens, book editor.".
• 2009025868 title "United States Supreme Court".
• 2009025868 type "text".