Matches in Library of Congress for { <http://lccn.loc.gov/2013016869> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 18 of
18
with 100 items per page.
- 2013016869 contributor B12723651.
- 2013016869 date "2013".
- 2013016869 description "Includes bibliographical references and index.".
- 2013016869 description "What kind of archaeology is it? -- What kind of investigation is it? -- What are the issue and the claim? -- What is the argument? -- What are the assumptions? -- Is the writing clear? -- Are (deceptive) rhetorical devices used? -- Is there a fallacy in the reasoning? -- Are there skeptical postmodern themes in the argument? -- Are facts clearly distinguished from opinions and other claims? -- How are the observations summarized? -- Is there an inductive argument? -- Is there a population estimate from a sample? -- Is there a theory? -- Which research program is it an example of? -- Is an explanation offered? -- Is there a causal argument? -- Are deductively valid conclusions drawn? -- Are concepts given archaeological interpretations? -- Are the conclusions reasonable?".
- 2013016869 extent "pages cm".
- 2013016869 identifier "9780759123403 (cloth : alk. paper)".
- 2013016869 identifier "9780759123410 (pbk. : alk. paper)".
- 2013016869 issued "2013".
- 2013016869 language "eng".
- 2013016869 subject "930.1072 23".
- 2013016869 subject "Archaeology Methodology.".
- 2013016869 subject "Archaeology Study and teaching.".
- 2013016869 subject "CC83 .G53 2013".
- 2013016869 subject "Critical thinking Study and teaching.".
- 2013016869 subject "Report writing.".
- 2013016869 tableOfContents "What kind of archaeology is it? -- What kind of investigation is it? -- What are the issue and the claim? -- What is the argument? -- What are the assumptions? -- Is the writing clear? -- Are (deceptive) rhetorical devices used? -- Is there a fallacy in the reasoning? -- Are there skeptical postmodern themes in the argument? -- Are facts clearly distinguished from opinions and other claims? -- How are the observations summarized? -- Is there an inductive argument? -- Is there a population estimate from a sample? -- Is there a theory? -- Which research program is it an example of? -- Is an explanation offered? -- Is there a causal argument? -- Are deductively valid conclusions drawn? -- Are concepts given archaeological interpretations? -- Are the conclusions reasonable?".
- 2013016869 title "Critically reading the theory and methods of archaeology : an introductory guide / Guy Gibbon.".
- 2013016869 type "text".