Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1027381#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 33 of
33
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A1".
- aggregation creator B411026.
- aggregation creator B411027.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2010".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1027381.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1471-2458.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have retained and own the full copyright for this publication".
- aggregation subject "Social Sciences".
- aggregation title "Consumer perceptions of beef healthiness: results from a qualitative study in four European countries".
- aggregation abstract "Background: Consumer perception of the healthiness of beef is an important determinant of beef consumption. However, little is known about how consumers perceive the healthiness of beef. The aim of this study is to shed light on the associations between beef and health. Methods: Eight focus group discussions were conducted in four European countries (France, UK, Germany, Spain), each consisting of seven to nine participants. A content analysis was performed on the transcripts of these discussions. Results: Although beef was generally perceived as healthful, focus group participants expected positive as well as negative effects of beef consumption on their health. Labelled, branded, fresh and lean beef were perceived as signalling healthful beef, in contrast with further processed and packaged beef. Consumers felt that their individual choices could make a difference with respect to the healthiness of beef consumed. Focus group participants were not in favour of improving beef healthiness during processing, but rather focussed on appropriate consumption behaviour and preparation methods. Conclusions: The individual responsibility for health implies that consumers should be able to make correct judgements about how healthful their food is. However, the results of this study indicate that an accurate assessment of beef healthiness is not always straightforward. The presented results on consumer perceptions of beef healthiness provide insights into consumer decision making processes, which are important for the innovation and product differentiation in the European beef sector, as well as for public health policy decisions related to meat consumption in general and beef consumption in particular.".
- aggregation authorList BK728273.
- aggregation volume "10".
- aggregation aggregates 1027391.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1027381.
- aggregation similarTo 1471-2458-10-342.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1027381.