Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1897252#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 30 of
30
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A2".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2014".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1897252.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:1373-5411.
- aggregation language "eng".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Philosophy and Religion".
- aggregation title "Critical and metacritical dimensions in Helmholtz's account of human vision".
- aggregation abstract "This paper takes Hermann von Helmholtz’s (1821 – 1894) psychophysiological theory of perception as a point of departure to examine the conditions of possibility for the process of objectification which necessarily mediates the interactions of complex living beings with their environment. By means of an analysis of the 1855 statement ‘to see is to understand sensation’, I will argue that the epistemological framework of Helmholtz’s optics can be analyzed transcendentally on two levels of analysis, namely critical and metacritical. Both levels are concerned with the way in which objectivity is constituted by an active, sensitive being, but while the former is concerned with the imposition of structure by our cognitive organization, the latter deals with the constitutional role of the (sensitivity) to constraint. It will be demonstrated how this general epistemological strategy could also help structuring the questions involved in accounting for the internal models that necessarily underlie the activity of anticipation. More specifically, I will argue that Helmholtz’s work could provide some powerful insights into the notion of ‘constraint’, which is considered to be crucial in accounting for the ability for anticipation according to Stepp and Turvey (2010), amongst others.".
- aggregation authorList BK633238.
- aggregation endPage "48".
- aggregation startPage "35".
- aggregation volume "26".
- aggregation aggregates 1897253.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1897252.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1897252.