Matches in UGent Biblio for { <https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1980847#aggregation> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation classification "A2".
- aggregation creator person.
- aggregation date "2011".
- aggregation format "application/pdf".
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.bibtex.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.csv.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.dc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.didl.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.doc.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.json.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.mets.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.mods.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.rdf.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.ris.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.txt.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.xls.
- aggregation hasFormat 1980847.yaml.
- aggregation isPartOf urn:issn:0035-2195.
- aggregation language "fre".
- aggregation rights "I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher".
- aggregation subject "Arts and Architecture".
- aggregation title "Le génie: chaînon manquant entre le goût et le sublime".
- aggregation abstract "Reinhart Koselleck has called the period between 1750 and 1850 a Sattelzeit, a time in which the Begriffsgeschichte of important socio-political concepts, such as ‘freedom’ and ‘liberty’ is in a state of change and conflict. Research on aesthetic concepts such as the beautiful and the sublime has shown that the rise of the new discipline ‘aesthetics’ in the late eighteenth century is accompanied by similar shifts in conceptual meanings. Burke’s A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757) and Kant’s Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790) are key texts in this development. As is well-known, Kant admitted that it was David Hume who had awakened him from his dogmatic slumber – this also holds true for his thinking on aesthetics, as Paul Guyer recently argued (2008). Much less stressed is the fact that Burke added an introduction on taste to the second edition of the Enquiry (1759), as a critical response to Hume’s Of the Standard of Taste (1757). Hume, Burke, and Kant seem to focus on the role and function of the critic, who – according to Burke and Kant – has to develop a taste for the sublime as the highest aesthetic pleasure. I want to argue that this critic is modelled on the concept of the artist as genius, and that the conceptual differences of ‘genius’ are deeply intertwined with the relation between the taste for the beautiful and that for the sublime.".
- aggregation authorList BK761943.
- aggregation endPage "116".
- aggregation issue "3".
- aggregation startPage "99".
- aggregation volume "303".
- aggregation aggregates 1980857.
- aggregation isDescribedBy 1980847.
- aggregation similarTo LU-1980847.